Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33372190›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Inclusive groups can avoid the tragedy of the commons.

Arend Hintze, Jochen Staudacher, Katja Gelhar, Alexander Pothmann, Juliana Rasch, Daniel Wildegger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arend HintzeInstitute for Complex Dynamical Systems and MicroData Analytics, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden. ahz@du.se.
Jochen StaudacherFaculty of Computer Science, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Kempten, Germany.
Katja GelharFaculty of Computer Science, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Kempten, Germany.
Alexander PothmannFaculty of Computer Science, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Kempten, Germany.
Juliana RaschFaculty of Computer Science, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Kempten, Germany.
Daniel WildeggerFaculty of Computer Science, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Kempten, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The public goods game is a famous example illustrating the tragedy of the commons (Hardin in Science 162:1243-1248, 1968). In this game cooperating individuals contribute to a pool, which in turn is distributed to all members of the group, including defectors who reap the same rewards as cooperators without having made a contribution before. The question is now, how to incentivize group members to all cooperate as it maximizes the common good. While costly punishment (Helbing et al. in New J Phys 12:083005, 2010) presents one such method, the cost of punishment still reduces the common good. The selfishness of the group members favors defectors. Here we show that including other members of the groups and sharing rewards with them can be another incentive for cooperation, avoiding the cost required for punishment. Further, we show how punishment and this form of inclusiveness interact. This work suggests that a redistribution similar to a basic income that is coupled to the economic success of the entire group could overcome the tragedy of the commons.

Identifiers

PMID33372190
PMCPMC7769990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.