Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33372181›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

In silico discovery of antigenic proteins and epitopes of SARS-CoV-2 for the development of a vaccine or a diagnostic approach for COVID-19.

Hüseyin Can, Ahmet Efe Köseoğlu, Sedef Erkunt Alak, Mervenur Güvendi, Mert Döşkaya, Muhammet Karakavuk, Adnan Yüksel Gürüz, Cemal Ün

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hüseyin CanDepartment of Biology Molecular Biology Section, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.
Ahmet Efe KöseoğluDepartment of Biology Molecular Biology Section, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.
Sedef Erkunt AlakDepartment of Biology Molecular Biology Section, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.
Mervenur GüvendiDepartment of Biology Molecular Biology Section, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.
Mert DöşkayaDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.
Muhammet KarakavukÖdemiş Vocational School, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.
Adnan Yüksel GürüzDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.
Cemal ÜnDepartment of Biology Molecular Biology Section, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey. cemaluen@gmail.com.
Ege University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the genome of SARS-CoV-2, the 5'-terminus encodes a polyprotein, which is further cleaved into 15 non-structural proteins whereas the 3' terminus encodes four structural proteins and eight accessory proteins. Among these 27 proteins, the present study aimed to discover likely antigenic proteins and epitopes to be used for the development of a vaccine or serodiagnostic assay using an in silico approach. For this purpose, after the full genome analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan isolate and variant proteins that are detected frequently, surface proteins including spike, envelope, and membrane proteins as well as proteins with signal peptide were determined as probable vaccine candidates whereas the remaining were considered as possible antigens to be used during the development of serodiagnostic assays. According to results obtained, among 27 proteins, 26 of them were predicted as probable antigen. In 26 proteins, spike protein was selected as the best vaccine candidate because of having a signal peptide, negative GRAVY value, one transmembrane helix, moderate aliphatic index, a big molecular weight, a long-estimated half-life, beta wrap motifs as well as having stable, soluble and non-allergic features. In addition, orf7a, orf8, and nsp-10 proteins with signal peptide were considered as potential vaccine candidates. Nucleocapsid protein and a highly antigenic GGDGKMKD epitope were identified as ideal antigens to be used in the development of serodiagnostic assays. Moreover, considering MHC-I alleles, highly antigenic KLNDLCFTNV and ITLCFTLKRK epitopes can be used to develop an epitope-based peptide vaccine.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCoronavirus Nucleocapsid ProteinsCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteGenome, ViralHumansMolecular Docking SimulationPhosphoproteinsSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusViral Nonstructural ProteinsViral ProteinsCoronavirus Nucleocapsid ProteinsCOVID-19 VaccinesEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteNsp10 protein, SARS virusnucleocapsid phosphoprotein, SARS-CoV-2ORF7a protein, SARS-CoV-2ORF8 protein, SARS-CoV-2PhosphoproteinsSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusViral Nonstructural ProteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33372181
PMCPMC7769971
OpenAlexW3116559800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.