Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33372161›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Affinity of small-molecule solutes to hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and chemically patterned interfaces in aqueous solution.

Jacob I Monroe, Sally Jiao, R Justin Davis, Dennis Robinson Brown, Lynn E Katz, M Scott Shell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Learning the relationship between nanoscale chemical patterning and hydrophobicity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Navigating the waters of membrane design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacob I MonroeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.ORCID 0000-0002-7654-2856
Sally JiaoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.ORCID 0000-0003-1729-0414
R Justin DavisDepartment of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Dennis Robinson BrownDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.ORCID 0000-0002-9598-406X
Lynn E KatzDepartment of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
M Scott ShellDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; shell@engineering.ucsb.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0439-1534

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Performance of membranes for water purification is highly influenced by the interactions of solvated species with membrane surfaces, including surface adsorption of solutes upon fouling. Current efforts toward fouling-resistant membranes often pursue surface hydrophilization, frequently motivated by macroscopic measures of hydrophilicity, because hydrophobicity is thought to increase solute-surface affinity. While this heuristic has driven diverse membrane functionalization strategies, here we build on advances in the theory of hydrophobicity to critically examine the relevance of macroscopic characterizations of solute-surface affinity. Specifically, we use molecular simulations to quantify the affinities to model hydroxyl- and methyl-functionalized surfaces of small, chemically diverse, charge-neutral solutes represented in produced water. We show that surface affinities correlate poorly with two conventional measures of solute hydrophobicity, gas-phase water solubility and oil-water partitioning. Moreover, we find that all solutes show attraction to the hydrophobic surface and most to the hydrophilic one, in contrast to macroscopically based hydrophobicity heuristics. We explain these results by decomposing affinities into direct solute interaction energies (which dominate on hydroxyl surfaces) and water restructuring penalties (which dominate on methyl surfaces). Finally, we use an inverse design algorithm to show how heterogeneous surfaces, with multiple functional groups, can be patterned to manipulate solute affinity and selectivity. These findings, importantly based on a range of solute and surface chemistries, illustrate that conventional macroscopic hydrophobicity metrics can fail to predict solute-surface affinity, and that molecular-scale surface chemical patterning significantly influences affinity-suggesting design opportunities for water purification membranes and other engineered interfaces involving aqueous solute-surface interactions.

Indexed as

inverse designmembrane foulingmolecular simulationsolvation free energysurface adsorption

Identifiers

PMID33372161
PMCPMC7821046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.