Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33371187›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Proteomic Resistance Biomarkers for PI3K Inhibitor in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenograft Models.

Zhanfang Guo, Tina Primeau, Jingqin Luo, Cynthia Zhang, Hua Sun, Jeremy Hoog, Feng Gao, Shixia Huang, Dean P Edwards, Sherri R Davies and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The Power and Promise of Patient-Derived Xenografts of Human Breast Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Engineering neoantigen vaccines to improve cancer personalized immunotherapy.International journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhanfang GuoDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Tina PrimeauDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Jingqin LuoDivision of Public Health Science, Siteman Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Cynthia ZhangDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Hua SunDepartment of Medicine, McDonnell Genome Institute, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2169-0808
Jeremy HoogDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Feng GaoDivision of Public Health Science, Siteman Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1425-1623
Shixia HuangDan L. Duncan Cancer Center and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2878-4129
Dean P EdwardsDan L. Duncan Cancer Center and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Sherri R DaviesDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-8354
Rebecca AftDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Li DingDepartment of Medicine, McDonnell Genome Institute, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Matthew J EllisLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Medicine and Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Shunqiang LiDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Cynthia X MaDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USBaylor College of Medicine · USJames S. McDonnell Foundation · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AIMEE S JAMES · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Washington University PDX Development and Trial Center - Evaluation of Abemaciclib in Combination with Olaparib in Ovarian Cancer and Breast Cancer Patient-derived Xenograft ModelsU54CA224083 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FENG CHEN · 2017 to 2026
$13.0M
Functional Proteomics by Reverse Phase Protein Array in CancerR50CA221675 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LU, YILING · 2017 to 2021
$726k
Quanterix 2470 Arrayer for Reverse Phase Protein Array TechnologyS10OD028648 · OD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI HUANG, SHIXIA · 2020 to 2020
$300k
A Sister's Hope N/ACancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas Established Investigator Award RR140033Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas Proteomics and Metabolomics Core Facility RP170005NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA125123NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS R50 CA221675NCI NIH HHS U54 CA224083NIH HHS S10 OD028648NIH HHS U54CA224083-03NIH S10 instrument award S10OD028648-01St. Louis Men's Group Against Cancer N/ASusan G. Komen for the Cure IIR13263475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PI3K pathway activation is frequently observed in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, single agent PI3K inhibitors have shown limited anti-tumor activity. To investigate biomarkers of response and resistance mechanisms, we tested 17 TNBC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models representing diverse genomic backgrounds and varying degrees of PI3K pathway signaling activities for their tumor growth response to the pan-PI3K inhibitor, BKM120. Baseline and post-treatment PDX tumors were subjected to reverse phase protein array (RPPA) to identify protein markers associated with tumor growth response. While BKM120 consistently reduced PI3K pathway activity, as demonstrated by reduced levels of phosphorylated AKT, percentage tumor growth inhibition (%TGI) ranged from 35% in the least sensitive to 84% in the most sensitive model. Several biomarkers showed significant association with resistance, including elevated baseline levels of growth factor receptors (EGFR, pHER3 Y1197), PI3Kp85 regulatory subunit, anti-apoptotic protein BclXL, EMT (Vimentin, MMP9, IntegrinaV), NFKB pathway (IkappaB, RANKL), and intracellular signaling molecules including Caveolin, CBP, and KLF4, as well as treatment-induced increases in the levels of phosphorylated forms of Aurora kinases. Interestingly, increased AKT phosphorylation or PTEN loss at baseline were not significantly correlated to %TGI. These results provide important insights into biomarker development for PI3K inhibitors in TNBC.

Indexed as

biomarkersBKM120patient-derived xenograftPI3K inhibitortriple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID33371187
PMCPMC7765949
OpenAlexW3115042298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.