ArticleMedicine2020
Herbal medicine for cervicogenic dizziness: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chinese Herbal Medicine for Cervicogenic Dizziness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHerbal medicines are empirically used to treat cervicogenic dizziness. However, till date there have been no systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these medicines. Therefore, this study protocol describes the methods for evaluating the efficacy and safety of herbal medicine for cervicogenic dizziness. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The following electronic academic databases will be searched up to December 2019 without language or publication status restrictions: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), together with Korean, Chinese, and Japanese databases. Any randomized controlled trials related to herbal medicine for cervicogenic dizziness will be included. The functional outcomes and the vertebrobasilar artery hemodynamic states will be evaluated as primary outcomes. The total effective rate, hematological conditions, and adverse events will be assessed as secondary outcomes. Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment of studies, and qualitative evaluation of clinical evidence will be performed by 2 independent reviewers. The methodological quality of the included studies will be evaluated using a revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The strength of evidence from the included data will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Data synthesis will be performed as either a fixed-effects or a random-effects model using Review Manager software version 5.3. The results will be reported as a risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes and as a mean difference or standardized mean difference for continuous outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required since the individual clinical information of the patient is not used. The findings of this systematic review will be disseminated through the peer-reviewed publications or conference presentations. REVIEW REGISTRY UNIQUE IDENTIFYING NUMBER: reviewregistry1036.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.