Observational studyMedicine2020
Genetically increased circulating 25(OH)D level reduces the risk of type 2 diabetes in subjects with deficiency of vitamin D: A large-scale Mendelian randomization study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Vitamin D and human health: evidence from Mendelian randomization studies.European journal of epidemiology · 2024Pooled it
- The impacts of vitamin D supplementation in adults with metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Dementia risk across distinct metabolic profiles in the UK Biobank.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Vitamin D is glucoprotective in aging males but not females.The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Levels of plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D and risk of developing type 2 diabetes in a large Danish primary health care population.Acta diabetologica · 2025Article
- The Role of Vitamin D and Its Molecular Bases in Insulin Resistance, Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome, and Cardiovascular Disease: State of the Art.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- Comparing the Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials for Nonskeletal Health Effects of Vitamin D.Nutrients · 2022Review
- Article
- Vitamin D, Vitamin D-Binding Proteins, and VDR Polymorphisms in Individuals with Hyperglycaemia.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Role of Vitamin D in the Metabolic Syndrome.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Does the High Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency in African Americans Contribute to Health Disparities?Nutrients · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractObservational studies have reported that Vitamin D deficiency and the risk type 2 diabetes are associated, but the causation is unclear. Mendelian randomization (MR) involving genetic variants as instrument variables (IVs) overcomes the reverse-casualty and unmeasured confounding. However, with limited sample size and IVs, previous MR studies showed inconsistent results. Leveraging by a largely increased sample size for both stages, we aim to provide an updated and precise estimate for the causality between Vitamin D and type 2 diabetes.A 2-sample multi-IVs MR was performed. IVs for circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) were obtained from a genome-wide association study from UK biobank involving 329,247 subjects of European ancestry. The causal effect of 25(OH)D and type 2 diabetes was estimated using traditional inverse variance weighting and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) framework which provides a robust estimate by systematically filtering out IVs identified with potential pleiotropy effects.A higher genetically instrumented 25(OH)D was causally linked to reduced risk of type 2 diabetes risk by MR-PRESSO [odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation (SD) = 0.950, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.913-0.988, P = .010] after removing 13 (13/193) invalid IVs. In addition, we confirmed the causal role Vitamin D using 2 synthesis-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which are consistent with previous MR studies [OR per SD = 0.894, 95% CI = 0.816-0.979, P = .016].With a largely improved sample size, our results confirmed that genetically increased 25(OH)D concentration reduced the risk of type 2 diabetes and provided a more precise estimate for the effect size. The updated result empowers the role of Vitamin D and provides nontrivial evidence for interventional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.