Observational studyMedicine2020
The recent effects of small dose of folic acid on lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 and systolic blood pressure variability in coronary heart disease patients with hyperhomocysteinemia: A single-center prospective cohort study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
abstractTo Investigate the recent effects of small dose of folic acid on lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (LP-PLA2) and systolic blood pressure variability in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients with hyperhomocysteinemia.In this prospective cohort study, a total of 167 CHD patients with hyperhomocysteinemia were consecutively enrolled, and they were divided into Group A (without folic acid intervention, n = 99), Group B (with 0.4 mg of folic acid intervention, n = 34), Group C (0.8 mg of folic acid intervention, n = 34). General information, fasting blood glucose, and blood lipid, folic acid, homocysteine, Lp-PLA2, and blood pressure variability were compared among 3 groups. The above indicators were reviewed after 3 months of treatment.There were no statistically significant differences of age, gender, blood pressure, incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose, folic acid, homocysteine, Lp-PLA2, total cholesterol, 3 acyl glycerin, apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein (a), high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol were found among 3 groups (P > .05); however, after being treated for 3 months, there was statistically significant difference in folic acid among 3 groups (P < .05), there was statistically significant difference in apolipoprotein A between Group A and Group B (t = 0.505, P = .039), and also between Group A and Group C (t = 0.052, P = .017). There were statistically significant differences in Lp-PLA2 (t = 24.320, P = .016) and systolic blood pressure variability (t = 0.154, P = .018) between Group A and Group C.For CHD patients with hyperhomocysteinemia, the higher dose (0.8 mg) of folic acid supplement was beneficial for increasing the apolipoprotein A, reducing the Lp-PLA2, and improving the systolic blood pressure variation, which might help to improve the prognosis in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.