Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33371073›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2020

Analysis of factors and corresponding interactions influencing clinical management assistant ability using competency model in China.

Xin Zheng, Jia Shi, Jinyi Wu

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Effects and safety ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xin ZhengWuhan Fourth Hospital; Puai Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China.
Jia Shi
Jinyi Wu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThe clinical management assistant (CMA) is an innovative and practical way to help manage a hospital, so the selection of CMA is important. This research is to find the influencing factors on the competency of CMA and help to select proper candidate of CMA.Based on the items of competency theory using the structural equation model, the data of 600 hospital managers from Shanghai, Guangzhou and Wuhan were identified by exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. In further analysis, the interactions among the factors were evaluated.A total of 20 items were identified as critical to CMA capability, which were further tested and divided into 3 factors: (1) personal characteristics; (2) competence; (3) thinking. The subsequent analysis showed that all factors had significant impact on CMA's ability, and competence contributed the most to the formation of CMA's ability, while the intermediary role of personal characteristics and thinking could not be ignored in practice. The results showed that the competency model contained these 3 factors and had the same structure as the classic competency model.This study presented a tentative approach for assessing CMA's competency, as well as provided the criteria to find and evaluate a CMA.

Indexed as

Models, OrganizationalChinaClinical CompetenceCommunicationFactor Analysis, StatisticalGroup ProcessesHospital AdministrationHumansLearningOrganizational InnovationProfessional CompetenceSocial IdentificationTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID33371073
PMCPMC7748185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.