Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33371049›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Implementing large-system, value-based healthcare initiatives: a realist study protocol for seven natural experiments.

Mitchell N Sarkies, Emilie Francis-Auton, Janet C Long, Andrew Partington, Chiara Pomare, Hoa Mi Nguyen, Wendy Wu, Johanna Westbrook, Richard O Day, Jean-Frederic Levesque and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Making implementation science more real.BMC medical research methodology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Mitchell N SarkiesAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia Mitchell.sarkies@mq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7318-3598
Emilie Francis-AutonAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.
Janet C LongAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0553-682X
Andrew PartingtonCentre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.
Chiara PomareAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9118-7207
Hoa Mi NguyenAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8431-9160
Wendy WuAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.
Johanna WestbrookAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.
Richard O DayClinical Pharmacology, St Vincents Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6045-6937
Jean-Frederic LevesqueBureau of Health Information, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Rebecca MitchellAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1939-1761
Frances RapportAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4428-2826
Henry CutlerCentre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.
Yvonne TranAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.
Robyn Clay-WilliamsAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6107-7445
Diane E WatsonBureau of Health Information, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Gaston ArnoldaAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.
Peter D HibbertAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7865-343X
Reidar LystadAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.
Virginia MumfordAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7915-0615
George LeipnikNew South Wales Ministry of Health, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Kim SutherlandNew South Wales Agency for Clinical Innovation, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Rebecca HardwickMedical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2488-829X
Jeffrey BraithwaiteAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0296-4957

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionValue-based healthcare delivery models have emerged to address the unprecedented pressure on long-term health system performance and sustainability and to respond to the changing needs and expectations of patients. Implementing and scaling the benefits from these care delivery models to achieve large-system transformation are challenging and require consideration of complexity and context. Realist studies enable researchers to explore factors beyond 'what works' towards more nuanced understanding of 'what tends to work for whom under which circumstances'. This research proposes a realist study of the implementation approach for seven large-system, value-based healthcare initiatives in New South Wales, Australia, to elucidate how different implementation strategies and processes stimulate the uptake, adoption, fidelity and adherence of initiatives to achieve sustainable impacts across a variety of contexts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This exploratory, sequential, mixed methods realist study followed RAMESES II (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) reporting standards for realist studies. Stage 1 will formulate initial programme theories from review of existing literature, analysis of programme documents and qualitative interviews with programme designers, implementation support staff and evaluators. Stage 2 envisages testing and refining these hypothesised programme theories through qualitative interviews with local hospital network staff running initiatives, and analyses of quantitative data from the programme evaluation, hospital administrative systems and an implementation outcome survey. Stage 3 proposes to produce generalisable middle-range theories by synthesising data from context-mechanism-outcome configurations across initiatives. Qualitative data will be analysed retroductively and quantitative data will be analysed to identify relationships between the implementation strategies and processes, and implementation and programme outcomes. Mixed methods triangulation will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by Macquarie University (Project ID 23816) and Hunter New England (Project ID 2020/ETH02186) Human Research Ethics Committees. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Results will be fed back to partner organisations and roundtable discussions with other health jurisdictions will be held, to share learnings.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareAustraliaHumansNew EnglandNew South WalesProgram Evaluationbone diseasesdiabetic footend stage renal failuregeneral diabeteshealth services administration & managementheart failure

Identifiers

PMID33371049
PMCPMC7757496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.