Observational studyBMJ open2020
Antithrombotic management of patients with acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary stenting: a prospective, observational, nationwide study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03656523 (Management of Antithrombotic TherApy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation or DevelOping AtRial Fibrillation During Hospitalization for PCI), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Management of Antithrombotic TherApy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation or DevelOping AtRial Fibrillation During Hospitalization for PCI
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-World Antithrombotic Management of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Article
- Management of Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Clinical Practice and Challenging Scenarios.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Changes in Antithrombotic Therapy Prescription in Patients with a Combination of Atrial Fibrillation and Myocardial Infarction in a Specialised Inpatient Department from 2016-2019 and Associations with Prognosis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- ANMCO-SIMEU consensus document: appropriate management of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Dual antithrombotic therapy and gastroprotection in atrial fibrillation: an observational primary care study.BJGP open · 2022Article
- Antithrombotic strategy and its relationship with outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic coronary syndrome.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2022Article
- ANMCO position paper on antithrombotic treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing intracoronary stenting and/or acute coronary syndromes.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Article
- Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the study was to assess current management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing coronary stenting.
designNon-interventional, prospective, nationwide study.
setting76 private or public cardiology centres in Italy.
participantsPatients with ACS with concomitant AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: To obtain accurate and up-to-date information on pharmacological management of patients with AF admitted for an ACS and undergoing PCI with stent implantation.
resultsOver a 12-month period, 598 consecutive patients were enrolled: 48.8% with AF at hospital admission and 51.2% developing AF during hospitalisation. At discharge, a triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) was prescribed in 64.8%, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in 25.7% and dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) in 8.8% of patients. Among patients with AF at admission, TAT and DAT were more frequently prescribed compared with patients with new-onset AF (76.3% vs 53.8% and 12.5% vs 5.3%, respectively; both p<0.0001), while a DAPT was less often used (11.2% vs 39.5%; p<0.0001). At multivariable analysis, a major bleeding event (OR: 5.40; 95% CI: 2.42 to 12.05; p<0.0001) and malignancy (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 1.77 to 14.78; p=0.003) resulted the most important independent predictors of DAT prescription.
conclusionsIn this contemporary registry of patients with ACS with AF treated with coronary stents, TAT still resulted as the antithrombotic strategy of choice, DAT was reserved for high bleeding risk and DAPT was mainly prescribed in those developing AF during hospitalisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03656523.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.