Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33370378›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

Observational study on time on treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide.

Giuseppe Fallara, Ingela Franck Lissbrant, Johan Styrke, Francesco Montorsi, Hans Garmo, Pär Stattin

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppe FallaraDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7872-2650
Ingela Franck LissbrantDepartment of Oncology Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Johan StyrkeDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Francesco MontorsiDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Hans GarmoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Pär StattinDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEUmeå University · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SEVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to assess time on treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide, two androgen receptor targeted (ART) drugs, the impact on time on treatment of time interval without drug supply between prescription fillings, and adherence to treatment. MATERIAL AND

methodsBy use of data from The National Prostate Cancer Register, The Prescribed Drug Registry and the Patient Registry, time on treatment with the abiraterone and enzalutamide was analyzed in all men with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in Sweden 2015-2019. Three time intervals between consecutive fillings, i.e. time without drug supply, were assessed. Adherence to the treatment was evaluated by use of the Medication Possession Ratio. Kaplan Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression model were used to assess factors affecting time on treatment.

resultsBetween January 2015 and October 2019, 1803 men filled a prescription for abiraterone and 4 534 men filled a prescription for enzalutamide. With a time interval of 30 days or less between two fillings, median time on treatment was 4.9 months (IQR 2.6-11.7) for abiraterone and 8.0 months (IQR 3.6-16.4) for enzalutamide. In sensitivity analyses, allowing for no more than 14 days without drug supply between fillings, median time on treatment was 3.9 months (IQR 2.1-9.0) for abiraterone and 5.9 months (IQR 2.8-12.1) for enzalutamide. Allowing for any time period without drug between fillings, median time on treatment was 5.7 months (IQR 2.7-14.0) for abiraterone and 9.8 months (IQR 4.4-21.0) for enzalutamide. Adherence to treatment was above 90% for both drugs.

conclusionTime on treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide was shorter in clinical practice than in randomized controlled trials and varied almost two-fold with time interval without drug. Adherence to treatment was high. The main limitation of our study was the lack of data on use of chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAgedAged, 80 and overAndrogen AntagonistsAndrostenesBenzamidesChemotherapy, AdjuvantDrug PrescriptionsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicabirateroneAndrogen AntagonistsAndrostenesBenzamidesenzalutamideNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoin

Identifiers

PMID33370378
PMCPMC7769419
OpenAlexW3117149595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.