Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33370375›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Feasibility of non-contact cardiorespiratory monitoring using impulse-radio ultra-wideband radar in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Won Hyuk Lee, Yonggu Lee, Jae Yoon Na, Seung Hyun Kim, Hyun Ju Lee, Young-Hyo Lim, Seok Hyun Cho, Sung Ho Cho, Hyun-Kyung Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Won Hyuk LeeDepartment of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yonggu LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Yoon NaDepartment of Pediatrics, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung Hyun KimDepartment of Pediatrics, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Ju LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Hyo LimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7203-7425
Seok Hyun ChoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Ho ChoDepartment of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2393-1428
Hyun-Kyung ParkDepartment of Pediatrics, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5956-9208
Hanyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent cardiorespiratory monitoring equipment can cause injuries and infections in neonates with fragile skin. Impulse-radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) radar was recently demonstrated to be an effective contactless vital sign monitor in adults. The purpose of this study was to assess heart rates (HRs) and respiratory rates (RRs) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) using IR-UWB radar and to evaluate its accuracy and reliability compared to conventional electrocardiography (ECG)/impedance pneumography (IPG).

methodsThe HR and RR were recorded in 34 neonates between 3 and 72 days of age during minimal movement (51 measurements in total) using IR-UWB radar (HRRd, RRRd) and ECG/IPG (HRECG, RRIPG) simultaneously. The radar signals were processed in real time using algorithms for neonates. Radar and ECG/IPG measurements were compared using concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) and Bland-Altman plots.

resultsFrom the 34 neonates, 12,530 HR samples and 3,504 RR samples were measured. Both the HR and RR measured using the two methods were highly concordant when the neonates had minimal movements (CCC = 0.95 between the RRRd and RRIPG, CCC = 0.97 between the HRRd and HRECG). In the Bland-Altman plot, the mean biases were 0.17 breaths/min (95% limit of agreement [LOA] -7.0-7.3) between the RRRd and RRIPG and -0.23 bpm (95% LOA -5.3-4.8) between the HRRd and HRECG. Moreover, the agreement for the HR and RR measurements between the two modalities was consistently high regardless of neonate weight.

conclusionsA cardiorespiratory monitor using IR-UWB radar may provide accurate non-contact HR and RR estimates without wires and electrodes for neonates in the NICU.

Indexed as

Monitoring, PhysiologicCardiorespiratory FitnessElectrocardiographyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart RateHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleRadarRespiratory RateSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID33370375
PMCPMC7769476
OpenAlexW3115650628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.