Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33370297›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Complete chloroplast genome comparisons for Pityopsis (Asteraceae).

E Anne Hatmaker, Phillip A Wadl, Timothy A Rinehart, Jennifer Carroll, Thomas S Lane, Robert N Trigiano, Margaret E Staton, Edward E Schilling

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plastomes of TenEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Phylogeny ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The chloroplast genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E Anne HatmakerDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7821-8160
Phillip A WadlU.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.
Timothy A RinehartU.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Production and Protection, Beltsville, Maryland, United States of America.
Jennifer CarrollU.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Thad Cochran Southern Horticultural Laboratory, Poplarville, Mississippi, United States of America.
Thomas S LaneDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Robert N TrigianoDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Margaret E StatonDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2971-9353
Edward E SchillingDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pityopsis includes several regionally and one federally endangered species of herbaceous perennials. Four species are highly localized, including the federally endangered P. ruthii. The genus includes several ploidy levels and interesting ecological traits such as drought tolerance and fire-dependent flowering. Results from previous cladistic analyses of morphology and from initial DNA sequence studies did not agree with one another or with the infrageneric taxonomic classification, with the result that infrageneric relationships remain unresolved. We sequenced, assembled, and compared the chloroplast (cp) genomes of 12 species or varieties of Pityopsis to better understand generic evolution. A reference cp genome 152,569 bp in length was assembled de novo from P. falcata. Reads from other sampled species were then aligned to the P. falcata reference and individual chloroplast genomes were assembled for each, with manual gapfilling and polishing. After removing the duplicated second inverted region, a multiple sequence alignment of the cp genomes was used to construct a maximum likelihood (ML) phylogeny for the twelve cp genomes. Additionally, we constructed a ML phylogeny from the nuclear ribosomal repeat region after mapping reads to the Helianthus annuus region. The chloroplast phylogeny supported two clades. Previously proposed clades and taxonomic sections within the genus were largely unsupported by both nuclear and chloroplast phylogenies. Our results provide tools for exploring hybridity and examining the physiological and genetic basis for drought tolerance and fire-dependent flowering. This study will inform breeding and conservation practices, and general knowledge of evolutionary history, hybridization, and speciation within Pityopsis.

Indexed as

Genome, ChloroplastAsteraceaeChromosome MappingMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhylogenySoutheastern United StatesSpecies SpecificityWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33370297
PMCPMC7769439
OpenAlexW3114473535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.