ArticlePLoS biology2020
Long-term experimental evolution of HIV-1 reveals effects of environment and mutational history.
Article in PLoS biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolution of virulence of a plant RNA virus in developmental stage-structured host populations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Diverse paths to broadly neutralizing antibody escape among HIV-1 strains.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- A recurrent adaptive mutation in the transmembrane 2B protein of an insect picorna-like virus in a nonnative host.Journal of virology · 2026Article
- IRES Mutation Confers a Replicative Advantage to SVA by Enhancing Translation Efficiency.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Substantial deceleration of adaptation of HIV-1 within 1500 generations in an experimental evolution: a genomic perspective.Virus evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Stronger binding affinities ofInfectious Disease Modelling · 2025Article
- Parallel evolution and enhanced virulence uponVirus evolution · 2023Article
- Joint effects of genes underlying a temperature specialization tradeoff in yeast.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An often-returning question for not only HIV-1, but also other organisms, is how predictable evolutionary paths are. The environment, mutational history, and random processes can all impact the exact evolutionary paths, but to which extent these factors contribute to the evolutionary dynamics of a particular system is an open question. Especially in a virus like HIV-1, with a large mutation rate and large population sizes, evolution is expected to be highly predictable if the impact of environment and history is low, and evolution is not neutral. We investigated the effect of environment and mutational history by analyzing sequences from a long-term evolution experiment, in which HIV-1 was passaged on 2 different cell types in 8 independent evolutionary lines and 8 derived lines, 4 of which involved a switch of the environment. The experiments lasted for 240-300 passages, corresponding to approximately 400-600 generations or almost 3 years. The sequences show signs of extensive parallel evolution-the majority of mutations that are shared between independent lines appear in both cell types, but we also find that both environment and mutational history significantly impact the evolutionary paths. We conclude that HIV-1 evolution is robust to small changes in the environment, similar to a transmission event in the absence of an immune response or drug pressure. We also find that the fitness landscape of HIV-1 is largely smooth, although we find some evidence for both positive and negative epistatic interactions between mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.