Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33370276›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2020

Delineating reef fish trophic guilds with global gut content data synthesis and phylogeny.

Valeriano Parravicini, Jordan M Casey, Nina M D Schiettekatte, Simon J Brandl, Chloé Pozas-Schacre, Jérémy Carlot, Graham J Edgar, Nicholas A J Graham, Mireille Harmelin-Vivien, Michel Kulbicki and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The rise of dietary diversity in coral reef fishes.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Valeriano ParraviciniPSL Université Paris: EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, USR 3278 CRIOBE, Université de Perpignan, Perpignan, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3408-1625
Jordan M CaseyPSL Université Paris: EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, USR 3278 CRIOBE, Université de Perpignan, Perpignan, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2434-7207
Nina M D SchiettekattePSL Université Paris: EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, USR 3278 CRIOBE, Université de Perpignan, Perpignan, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1925-3484
Simon J BrandlPSL Université Paris: EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, USR 3278 CRIOBE, Université de Perpignan, Perpignan, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6649-2496
Chloé Pozas-SchacrePSL Université Paris: EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, USR 3278 CRIOBE, Université de Perpignan, Perpignan, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3044-4644
Jérémy CarlotPSL Université Paris: EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, USR 3278 CRIOBE, Université de Perpignan, Perpignan, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0887-8005
Graham J EdgarInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0833-9001
Nicholas A J GrahamLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0304-7467
Mireille Harmelin-VivienAix-Marseille Université, Institut Méditerranéen d'Océanologie, CNRS/INSU, Marseille, France.
Michel KulbickiUMR Entropie, LabEx Corail, IRD, Université de Perpignan, Perpignan, France.
Giovanni StronaUniversity of Helsinki, Department of Bioscience, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2294-4013
Rick D Stuart-SmithCentre for the Synthesis and Analysis of Biodiversity (CESAB), Institut Bouisson Bertrand, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding species' roles in food webs requires an accurate assessment of their trophic niche. However, it is challenging to delineate potential trophic interactions across an ecosystem, and a paucity of empirical information often leads to inconsistent definitions of trophic guilds based on expert opinion, especially when applied to hyperdiverse ecosystems. Using coral reef fishes as a model group, we show that experts disagree on the assignment of broad trophic guilds for more than 20% of species, which hampers comparability across studies. Here, we propose a quantitative, unbiased, and reproducible approach to define trophic guilds and apply recent advances in machine learning to predict probabilities of pairwise trophic interactions with high accuracy. We synthesize data from community-wide gut content analyses of tropical coral reef fishes worldwide, resulting in diet information from 13,961 individuals belonging to 615 reef fish. We then use network analysis to identify 8 trophic guilds and Bayesian phylogenetic modeling to show that trophic guilds can be predicted based on phylogeny and maximum body size. Finally, we use machine learning to test whether pairwise trophic interactions can be predicted with accuracy. Our models achieved a misclassification error of less than 5%, indicating that our approach results in a quantitative and reproducible trophic categorization scheme, as well as high-resolution probabilities of trophic interactions. By applying our framework to the most diverse vertebrate consumer group, we show that it can be applied to other organismal groups to advance reproducibility in trait-based ecology. Our work thus provides a viable approach to account for the complexity of predator-prey interactions in highly diverse ecosystems.

Indexed as

Food ChainAnimalsBayes TheoremBody SizeCoral ReefsDietEcologyEcosystemFishesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeModels, TheoreticalPhylogenyReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID33370276
PMCPMC7793298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.