Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33369789›Full record

ReviewExperimental physiology2021

Physiological regulation of bone length and skeletal proportion in mammals.

Elaine Zhou, Julian Lui

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Elaine ZhouSection on Growth and Development, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Julian LuiSection on Growth and Development, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0611-4901
National Institute of Child Health · PK

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NEW

findingsWhat is the topic of this review? Mechanisms regulating bone length and skeletal proportions What advances does it highlight? The study of differential bone length between leg and finger bones, metatarsals of the Egyptian jerboa and genomic analysis of giraffes. ABSTRACT: Among mammalian species, skeletal structures vary greatly in size and shape, leading to a dramatic variety of body sizes and proportions. How different bones grow to different lengths, whether among different species, different individuals of the same species, or even in different anatomical parts of our the body, has always been a fascinating subject of research in biology and physiology. In the current review, we focus on some of the recent advances in the field and discuss how these provided important new insights into the mechanisms regulating bone length and skeletal proportions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody SizeBone and BonesBone DevelopmentChondrocytesGrowth PlateMammalsbody sizechondrocytegrowth platesenescenceskeletal growth

Identifiers

PMID33369789
PMCPMC7855611
OpenAlexW3113584133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.