Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33369694›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2021

[The role of gratifications in the process of adopting new media in higher age : Results of a qualitative study with very old users of digital media].

Julian Wangler, Michael Jansky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julian WanglerZentrum für Allgemeinmedizin und Geriatrie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Am Pulverturm 13, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. julian.wangler@unimedizin-mainz.de.
Michael JanskyZentrum für Allgemeinmedizin und Geriatrie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Am Pulverturm 13, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA widespread assumption is that people learn certain ways of dealing with media in the course of their youth and adult life, which later make it difficult for them to develop new patterns of media usage. Beyond theoretical assumptions, there is a lack of exploratory studies that investigate the conditions under which older people pick up new media technologies and integrate them into their everyday lives. MATERIAL AND

methodsFrom October 2019 to March 2020 a total of 16 semi-standardized individual interviews were carried out with people aged between 80 and 92 years. The interviewees had learned to use a digital medium on their own in the past few years and had integrated this into their everyday lives.

resultsThe interviewees appropriated new media in a targeted manner. It is noticeable that processes of appropriation were largely triggered by severe changes in living conditions. In addition, most of the interviewees learned how to use a digital medium because they wanted to use specific functions. With some delay, new options for online use have been explored. With respect to the primary motivations and gratifications of appropriation, the following patterns were identified: new media as 1) hobby expansion, 2) support network, 3) compensation instrument, 4) connectivity option, 5) breaking out of everyday life.

conclusionAs far as older people perceive practical everyday potentials of use, they show a high degree of adaptability with respect to new media. Against this backdrop, a gratification-oriented model appears to be a promising starting point for explaining the requirements for media appropriation on the basis of motifs that create meaningful incentives to learn how to use new media in old age.

Indexed as

InternetPleasureAdolescentAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMotivationQualitative ResearchTechnologyDigitalizationInternetMedia adoptionMedia usageNew mediaOld ageOlder people

Identifiers

PMID33369694
PMCPMC8636434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.