Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33369693›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2021

[Involving the seldom heard in participatory health research: challenges and strategies].

Ina Schaefer, Susanne Kümpers, Tina Cook

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Inequality paradox at the community level?]Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. [Big Data in health promotion and prevention].Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung · 2022
    Article
  8. Ethical Frameworks and Global Health: A Narrative Review of the "Leave No One Behind" Principle.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ina SchaeferAlice Salomon Hochschule Berlin, Alice-Salomon-Platz 5, 12627, Berlin, Deutschland. ina.schaefer@ash-berlin.eu.
Susanne KümpersFachbereich Pflege und Gesundheit, Hochschule Fulda, 36037, Fulda, Deutschland.
Tina CookFaculty of Liberal Arts, Education and Social Science, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool, Großbritannien.
Alice-Salomon-Hochschule Berlin · DEFulda University of Applied Sciences · DELiverpool Hope University · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1014-35062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticipatory health research is gaining increasing recognition in the public health sector. The people whose lives or work are central to wicked issues around health inequalities are integrated into the projects. Including diverse forms of knowledge and perspectives has the capability of strengthening health equity in specific settings. That proffers agency to the voices of those who are seldom heard. Often, participatory health research (PHR) is done with communities. Finding the truly isolated - those who are not connected to others or to services, the seldom heard - presents a challenge for research. Without hearing the voices of those most distanced from mainstream discourse we run the risk of misunderstanding issues pertinent to their lives. This narrative overview highlights this problem and aims to contribute a solution approach for research practice.

methodsAn extensive literature review for participatory research references in the German language was used and the international literature was also screened. Furthermore, the processes of three participatory research projects were evaluated. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: The specified strategies to involve the seldom heard refer to lowered systemic barriers and improved local capacity for their participation. For example, before research can start, time should be given for a preparatory phase. This can be used to invest in relationships and co-operation to bridge the distance to research.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePublic HealthGermanyHearingHumansInclusionParticipationParticipatory health researchRecruitmentSeldom heard

Identifiers

PMID33369693
PMCPMC7843470
OpenAlexW3117273980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.