Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33369691›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

What is the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of oral cancer in 2020?

Remco de Bree, Bart de Keizer, Francisco J Civantos, Robert P Takes, Juan P Rodrigo, Juan C Hernandez-Prera, Gyorgy B Halmos, Alessandra Rinaldo, Alfio Ferlito

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Beyond sentinel node biopsy: preliminary results of indocyanine green-guided neck dissection in cN0 tongue cancer.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. First study on the efficiency ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Factors Affecting Drain Output in Oral Carcinoma.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Augmented reality for sentinel lymph node biopsy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  19. The potential of the Crystal Cam handheld gamma-camera for preoperative and intraoperative sentinel lymph node localization in early-stage oral cancer.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Remco de BreeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. r.debree@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7128-5814
Bart de KeizerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6270-9483
Francisco J CivantosDepartment of Otolaryngology, Sylvester Cancer Center, University of Miami, Florida, USA.
Robert P TakesDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Juan P RodrigoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias-University of Oviedo, ISPA, IUOPA, Oviedo, Spain.
Juan C Hernandez-PreraDepartment of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Gyorgy B HalmosDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2460-2260
Alessandra RinaldoDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Udine School of Medicine, Udine, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7956-6709
Alfio FerlitoInternational Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8247-8002
Moffitt Cancer Center · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversidad de Oviedo · ESUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Udine · ITUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 70-80% of patients with cT1-2N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) ultimately prove to have no cancer in the cervical lymphatics on final pathology after selective neck dissection. As a result, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been adopted during the last decade as a diagnostic staging method to intelligently identify patients who would benefit from formal selective lymphadenectomy or neck irradiation. While not yet universally accepted, SLNB is now incorporated in many national guidelines. SLNB offers a less invasive alternative to elective neck dissection (END), and has some advantages and disadvantages. SLNB can assess the individual drainage pattern and, with step serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry (IHC), can enable the accurate detection of micrometastases and isolated tumor cells (ITCs). Staging of the neck is improved relative to END with routine histopathological examination. The improvements in staging are particularly notable for the contralateral neck and the pretreated neck. However, for floor of mouth (FOM) tumors, occult metastases are frequently missed by SLNB due to the proximity of activity from the primary site to the lymphatics (the shine through phenomenon). For FOM cancers, it is advised to perform either elective neck dissection or superselective neck dissection of the preglandular triangle of level I. New tracers and techniques under development may improve the diagnostic accuracy of SLNB for early-stage OSCC, particularly for FOM tumors. Treatment of the neck (either neck dissection or radiotherapy), although limited to levels I-IV, remains mandatory for any positive category of metastasis (macrometastasis, micrometastasis, or ITCs). Recently, the updated EANM practical guidelines for SLN localization in OSCC and the surgical consensus guidelines on SLNB in patients with OSCC were published. In this review, the current evidence and results of SLNB in early OSCC are presented.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsMouth NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyLymph node metastasisNeck dissectionOral cancerSentinel node biopsyStaging

Identifiers

PMID33369691
PMCPMC8328894
OpenAlexW3117332898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.