Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33369465›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2020

Increasing Engagement for Breast Cancer Screening and Treatment: The "ICANTREAT" Community of Expertise Initiative.

Thejas R Kathrikolly, Suma Nair, Amudha S Poobalan, Ranjitha S Shetty, Sheela Tripathee, Sara J Mac Lennan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Using Human-Centered Design Tools to Improve Health Justice.Journal of graduate medical education · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thejas R KathrikollyDepartment of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4492-5254
Suma NairDepartment of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1843-075X
Amudha S PoobalanInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0002-6975-3874
Ranjitha S ShettyDepartment of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3210-2293
Sheela TripatheeInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0003-1280-1406
Sara J Mac LennanInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0003-1405-6964

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncidence of breast cancer and associated mortality are on the rise globally. Breast cancer incidence in India is on the rise and also accounts for a staggering 50% mortality rate among women. Health illiteracy, socio-economic and cultural barriers in addition to lack of an organized nationwide screening and prevention programme contribute to poor patient outcomes. Thus, it is imperative to strengthen the existing screening and treatment facilities to address the increasing cancer burden. In this regard, we conducted a workshop to investigate the scope of a multi- stakeholder engagement in breast cancer screening and treatment.

methodsA stakeholder workshop grounded in an established co-design methodology  was convened in a semi-urban coastal district in South India with active participation of physicians, surgeons, occupational therapists, community leaders, programme officers, public health professionals and breast cancer survivors. Shiffman and Smith's framework was adapted to highlight barriers to screening and role of stakeholders in the co-design of solutions.

resultsDeliberate and active discussions marked the workshop proceedings resulting in the identification of   individual and systems level barriers, facilitators and implementation strategies. Social stigma and non-existent standard protocols for screening and referral were recognised as critical barriers, while community engagement and a dedicated patient advocate were the proposed facilitators.

conclusionThis workshop was an important step in bringing together key stakeholders and marked the beginning of the ICANTREAT initiative and a Community of Expertise. The outcomes highlight the importance of stakeholder involvement in the cancer- care pathway for breast cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyCommunity Health PlanningEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFocus GroupsHumanscancer- carepatient advocatestakeholderworkshop

Identifiers

PMID33369465
PMCPMC8046307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.