ReviewNursing open2021
Development of health behaviour questionnaire for breast cancer women in Mainland China.
Review in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive insight into nimbolide response against breast cancer treatment: present evidence, emerging strategy and future direction.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- The Adolescent Insomnia Questionnaire: the Turkish validity and reliability study.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024Article
- Development and validation of Adaptability to Return-to-Work Scale (ARTWS) for cancer patients.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Development of health behaviour questionnaire for breast cancer women in Mainland China.Nursing open · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo develop a questionnaire on the health behaviour of breast cancer women with adjuvant endocrine therapy and to test its reliability and validity.
designAn instrument-development study was applied that comprised three steps: conceptualization, item generation, content validity and field testing of the health behavior properties.
methodsOn the basis of literature review, the conceptual framework and initial items of each dimension of were designed. The questionnaire investigation was divided into two steps: pre-experiment (group 1) and psychometrics evaluation (group 2). Correlation procedure and factor analysis were employed to rescreen the items. Reliability testing and validity testing were conducted to analyse the psychometric properties of questionnaire.
resultsExploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded a five-factor solution. Cronbach's α was 0.93, the sub-semi-reliability of the questionnaire was 0.79 and internal consistency coefficients was 0.70.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.