Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33369236›Full record

Observational studyPM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2021

The Feasibility of Prehabilitation as Part of the Breast Cancer Treatment Pathway.

Fiona Wu, Roberto Laza-Cagigas, Aalia Pagarkar, Adeola Olaoke, Mohsen El Gammal, Tarannum Rampal

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Virtual Therapy Complementary Prehabilitation of Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer-A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Multimodal Prehabilitation in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Feasibility Study.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Barriers and enablers to exercise prehabilitation before breast cancer surgery in an Australian regional health service: patient and clinician perspective.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fiona WuSurgery Department, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8295-788X
Roberto Laza-CagigasPrehabilitation Unit, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, UK.
Aalia PagarkarSurgery Department, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, UK.
Adeola OlaokeSurgery Department, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, UK.
Mohsen El GammalSurgery Department, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, UK.
Tarannum RampalPrehabilitation Unit, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, UK.
Medway Maritime Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is compelling support for implementing prehabilitation to optimize perioperative risk factors and to improve postoperative outcomes. However, there is limited evidence studying the application of multimodal prehabilitation for patients with breast cancer.

objectiveTo determine the feasibility of multimodal prehabilitation as part of the breast cancer treatment pathway.

designThis was a prospective, cohort observational study. Breast cancer patients undergoing surgery were recruited. They were assigned to an intervention or control group according to patient preference.

settingUK prehabilitation center.

participantsA total of 75 patients were referred during the study period. Forty eight patients (64%) did not participate; 20 of those opted to be in the control group. Twenty four patients engaged with prehabilitation and returned completed questionnaires. In total, 44 patients were included in the analysis.

interventionsThe program consisted of supervised exercise, nutritional advice, smoking cessation, and psychosocial support. OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility was determined by the center's ability to deliver the program. This was measured by the number of patients who wanted to access the service, compared with those able to. Service uptake, patient satisfaction, and project costs were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and the use of healthcare resources were also evaluated.

resultsA total of 61 patients (81%) wanted to participate; 24 (32%) were able to partake and return questionnaires. Reasons for nonparticipation included surgery within weeks, full-time commitments, and transportation difficulties. A total of 25 (93%) prehabilitation patients recorded high satisfaction with the program. There was a significant reduction in anxiety among prehabilitation patients. There were no significant improvements in the other PROs. There were no changes to hospital length of stay, readmissions, and complications.

conclusionsMultimodal prehabilitation is a feasible intervention. Logistical challenges need to be addressed to improve engagement. These results are limited and would require a larger sample to confirm the findings. Work on a thorough cost-benefit analysis is also required.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPreoperative ExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPreoperative CareProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33369236
PMCPMC8596630
OpenAlexW3114922566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.