Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33369151›Full record

SynthesisClinical obesity2021

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of dietary interventions for weight loss in adults in the Middle East and north Africa region.

Hadeel Zaghloul, Hadya Elshakh, Abdullah Elzafarany, Odette Chagoury, Barbara McGowan, Shahrad Taheri

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical obesity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Hadeel ZaghloulDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Hadya ElshakhDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Abdullah ElzafaranyDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Odette ChagouryDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Barbara McGowanDepartment of Diabetes, King's College London, London, UK.
Shahrad TaheriDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-1500
King's College London · GBWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QA

Funding

Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF) through the National Priorities Research Program (NPRP) NPRP 8-912-3-192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence and incidence of obesity, and associated complications, such as type 2 diabetes, in the Middle East and north Africa (MENA) region rank among the highest in the world. Little is known about the effectiveness of dietary weight loss interventions conducted in the MENA region. We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials aiming to assess the effectiveness of dietary interventions for weight loss in the adult population originating from and residing in the MENA region. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and EMBASE were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) using dietary interventions for weight loss conducted in the MENA region. RCTs examining weight loss as an outcome in adults (≥ 18 years old) were included. The Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias was used to ascertain the quality of the eligible RCTs and the Template for Intervention Description and Replication for population health and policy interventions (TIDieR-PHP) checklist was used to evaluate the reporting of the interventions. Twenty-nine RCTs including 2792 adults from five countries in the MENA region met the search criteria. Study participants were predominantly middle-aged females. Duration of follow up was mostly 3 months or less. Weight loss ranged from -0.7 to 16 kg across all intervention groups and the average weight loss was 4.8 kg. There was paucity of description of the weight loss interventions and variations amongst studies did not allow a meta-analysis of findings. It was not possible to draw firm conclusions on the effectiveness of dietary weight loss interventions in the region. High quality studies using more structured interventions of longer duration with standardized outcome measures are needed in the MENA region to support clinical practice with evidence-based interventions for obesity.

Indexed as

ObesityWeight LossAdultAfrica, NorthernDietFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMiddle EastRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicdietMiddle Eastnorth Africasystematic reviewweight loss

Identifiers

PMID33369151
PMCPMC7988652
OpenAlexW3114754540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.