Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33368994›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2021

Confounders of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio when used as a screening test in hypertensive patients: A critical analysis of the literature.

Gregory P Veldhuizen, Rawan M Alnazer, Abraham A Kroon, Peter W de Leeuw

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gregory P VeldhuizenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center & Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rawan M AlnazerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center & Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abraham A KroonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center & Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Peter W de LeeuwDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center & Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4949-5812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is a common screening test for primary aldosteronism in hypertensives. However, there are many factors which could confound the ARR test result and reduce the accuracy of this test. The present review's objective is to identify these factors and to describe to what extent they affect the ARR. Our analysis revealed that sex, age, posture, and sodium-intake influence the ARR, whereas assay techniques do not. Race and body mass index have an uncertain effect on the ARR. We conclude that several factors can affect the ARR. Not taking these factors into account could lead to misinterpretation of the ARR.

Indexed as

HyperaldosteronismHypertensionAldosteroneHumansReninRenin-Angiotensin SystemAldosteroneReninaldosteronehyperaldosteronismhypertensionreninscreening

Identifiers

PMID33368994
PMCPMC8030008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.