Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33368868›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2021

Subject-specific segregation of functional territories based on deep phenotyping.

Ana Luísa Pinho, Alexis Amadon, Murielle Fabre, Elvis Dohmatob, Isabelle Denghien, Juan Jesús Torre, Chantal Ginisty, Séverine Becuwe-Desmidt, Séverine Roger, Laurence Laurier and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Principles of intensive human neuroimaging.Trends in neurosciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Limits of decoding mental states with fMRI.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Ana Luísa PinhoUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8718-0902
Alexis AmadonUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Murielle FabreCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, INSERM, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France.
Elvis DohmatobUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, Palaiseau, France.
Isabelle DenghienCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, INSERM, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France.
Juan Jesús TorreUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, Palaiseau, France.
Chantal GinistyCEA Saclay/DRF/IFJ/NeuroSpin/UNIACT, Paris, France.
Séverine Becuwe-DesmidtCEA Saclay/DRF/IFJ/NeuroSpin/UNIACT, Paris, France.
Séverine RogerCEA Saclay/DRF/IFJ/NeuroSpin/UNIACT, Paris, France.
Laurence LaurierCEA Saclay/DRF/IFJ/NeuroSpin/UNIACT, Paris, France.
Véronique Joly-TestaultCEA Saclay/DRF/IFJ/NeuroSpin/UNIACT, Paris, France.
Gaëlle Médiouni-CloarecCEA Saclay/DRF/IFJ/NeuroSpin/UNIACT, Paris, France.
Christine DoubléCEA Saclay/DRF/IFJ/NeuroSpin/UNIACT, Paris, France.
Bernadette MartinsCEA Saclay/DRF/IFJ/NeuroSpin/UNIACT, Paris, France.
Philippe PinelCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, INSERM, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France.
Evelyn EgerCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, INSERM, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France.
Gaël VaroquauxUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, Palaiseau, France.
Christophe PallierCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, INSERM, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France.
Stanislas DehaeneCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, INSERM, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France.
Lucie Hertz-PannierCEA Saclay/DRF/IFJ/NeuroSpin/UNIACT, Paris, France.
Bertrand ThirionUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5018-7895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has opened the possibility to investigate how brain activity is modulated by behavior. Most studies so far are bound to one single task, in which functional responses to a handful of contrasts are analyzed and reported as a group average brain map. Contrariwise, recent data-collection efforts have started to target a systematic spatial representation of multiple mental functions. In this paper, we leverage the Individual Brain Charting (IBC) dataset-a high-resolution task-fMRI dataset acquired in a fixed environment-in order to study the feasibility of individual mapping. First, we verify that the IBC brain maps reproduce those obtained from previous, large-scale datasets using the same tasks. Second, we confirm that the elementary spatial components, inferred across all tasks, are consistently mapped within and, to a lesser extent, across participants. Third, we demonstrate the relevance of the topographic information of the individual contrast maps, showing that contrasts from one task can be predicted by contrasts from other tasks. At last, we showcase the benefit of contrast accumulation for the fine functional characterization of brain regions within a prespecified network. To this end, we analyze the cognitive profile of functional territories pertaining to the language network and prove that these profiles generalize across participants.

Indexed as

Atlases as TopicAdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexDatasets as TopicEcho-Planar ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMental ProcessesModels, TheoreticalNerve NetPhenotypeatlasesbrain imagingcognitive functiondata setfunctional magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID33368868
PMCPMC7856658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.