ArticleHuman mutation2021
GeneBreaker: Variant simulation to improve the diagnosis of Mendelian rare genetic diseases.
Article in Human mutation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering complex genome rearrangements in C. elegans using short-read whole genome sequencing.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- GeneBreaker: Variant simulation to improve the diagnosis of Mendelian rare genetic diseases.Human mutation · 2021Article
- A Novel Quality-Control Procedure to Improve the Accuracy of Rare Variant Calling in SNP Arrays.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mendelian rare genetic diseases affect 5%-10% of the population, and with over 5300 genes responsible for ∼7000 different diseases, they are challenging to diagnose. The use of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has bolstered the diagnosis rate significantly. The effective use of WGS relies on the ability to identify the disrupted gene responsible for disease phenotypes. This process involves genomic variant calling and prioritization, and is the beneficiary of improvements to sequencing technology, variant calling approaches, and increased capacity to prioritize genomic variants with potential pathogenicity. As analysis pipelines continue to improve, careful testing of their efficacy is paramount. However, real-life cases typically emerge anecdotally, and utilization of clinically sensitive and identifiable data for testing pipeline improvements is regulated and limiting. We identified the need for a gene-based variant simulation framework that can create mock rare disease scenarios, utilizing known pathogenic variants or through the creation of novel gene-disrupting variants. To fill this need, we present GeneBreaker, a tool that creates synthetic rare disease cases with utility for benchmarking variant calling approaches, testing the efficacy of variant prioritization, and as an educational mechanism for training diagnostic practitioners in the expanding field of genomic medicine. GeneBreaker is freely available at http://GeneBreaker.cmmt.ubc.ca.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.