Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33368068›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2021

An Evaluation on Deep Caries Removal Method and Management Performed by Undergraduate Dental Students: A Malaysia Experience.

Nurin Izyani Othman, Hanan Umaira Ismail, Norazlina Mohammad, Norzalina Ghazali, Muhammad Syafiq Alauddin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Tunnel Restoration: A Minimally Invasive Dentistry Practice.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nurin Izyani OthmanFaculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Hanan Umaira IsmailFaculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Norazlina MohammadDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Norzalina GhazaliDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Muhammad Syafiq AlauddinDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia · MY

Funding

United States Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia (USIM)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the current knowledge and attitude of deep caries removal method among dental students in Malaysia. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 303 students ( STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Independent

resultsSeventy four percent of the students have the knowledge of the different methods of caries removal, while 25.8% were only familiar with complete caries removal. The preferred method for deep caries removal in permanent teeth was partial caries removal (53%). For primary dentition, 45.6% of the students prefer to perform pulpotomy as compared with other techniques. There was no significant difference in caries removal method for permanent teeth between undergraduate year of study (

conclusionsThis study showed that partial caries removal was the preferred method despite partial understanding on the identification of the clinical indicators of the technique.

Identifiers

PMID33368068
PMCPMC8195624
OpenAlexW3115264537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.