Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33367939›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2021

Current state of perinatal postmortem magnetic resonance imaging: European Society of Paediatric Radiology questionnaire-based survey and recommendations.

Elspeth Whitby, Amaka C Offiah, Susan C Shelmerdine, Rick R van Rijn, Michael Aertsen, Willemijn M Klein, David Perry, Stacy K Goergen, Christian Abel, Ajay Taranath and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Forensic neuropathology: 2026 update.Free neuropathology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. The current state of forensic imaging - post mortem imaging.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Added value of postmortem mri in sudden unexpected infant death cases.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Elspeth WhitbyUniversity of Sheffield and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Jessop Wing, Tree Root Walk, Sheffield, S10 1SF, UK. e.whitby@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8912-8013
Amaka C OffiahAcademic Unit of Child Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Susan C ShelmerdineDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Rick R van RijnDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael AertsenDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Willemijn M KleinDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
David PerryRadiology Department, National Women's Health and Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Stacy K GoergenMonash Imaging, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Christian AbelDepartment of Medical Imaging, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Ajay TaranathDepartment of Medical Imaging, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Dominic GaschoZurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elka MillerDepartment of Medical Imaging, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Owen J ArthursDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAuckland City Hospital · NZJessop Hospital · GBJohn Hunter Hospital · AUKU Leuven · BEMonash University · AURadboud University Nijmegen · NLSheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Zurich · CHWomen's and Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2017-10-037Medical Research Council MR/R002118/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostmortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in perinatal and childhood deaths is increasingly used as a noninvasive adjunct or alternative to autopsy. Imaging protocols vary between centres and consensus guidelines do not exist.

objectiveOur aim was to develop practical, standardised recommendations for perinatal postmortem MRI. MATERIALS AND

methodsRecommendations were based on the results of two surveys regarding local postmortem MRI practices sent electronically to all 14 members of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) Postmortem Imaging Task Force and 17 members of the International Society of Forensic Radiology and Imaging Task Force (25 different centres).

resultsOverall, 11/14 (78.6%) respondents from different institutions perform postmortem MRI. All of these centres perform postmortem MRI for perinatal and neonatal deaths, but only 6/11 (54.5%) perform imaging in older children.

conclusionWe propose a clinical standard for postmortem MRI sequences plus optional sequences for neuroimaging and cardiac anatomy depending on available scanning time and referral indications.

Indexed as

RadiologyAutopsyChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesConsensus recommendationsFoetalImagingMagnetic resonance imagingPerinatalPostmortemProtocolSurvey

Identifiers

PMID33367939
PMCPMC8055569
OpenAlexW3117377042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.