Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33367859›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2021

Prognostic validation and clinical implications of the EANO ESMO classification of leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumors.

Emilie Le Rhun, Patrick Devos, Johannes Weller, Katharina Seystahl, Francesca Mo, Annette Compter, Anna S Berghoff, Joost L M Jongen, Fabian Wolpert, Roberta Rudà and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 81 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The evolving landscape of leptomeningeal metastases from NSCLC: an international, contemporary, multicenter cohort study.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2026
    Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Emilie Le RhunUniversity of Lille, Inserm, Lille, France.
Patrick DevosUniversity of Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Lille, France.
Johannes WellerDepartment of Neurology, Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Katharina SeystahlDepartment of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Francesca MoDepartment of Neuro-oncology, City of Health and Science and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Annette CompterDepartment of Neuro-oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anna S BerghoffDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Joost L M JongenBrain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Fabian WolpertDepartment of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Roberta RudàDepartment of Neuro-oncology, City of Health and Science and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Dieta BrandsmaDepartment of Neuro-oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-9904
Martin van den BentBrain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Matthias PreusserDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ulrich HerrlingerDepartment of Neurology, Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Michael WellerDepartment of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1748-174X
University of Zurich · CHErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLMedical University of Vienna · ATThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity of Turin · ITInserm · FRUniversité de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe EANO ESMO guidelines have proposed a classification of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from solid cancers based on clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology presentation. MRI patterns are classified as linear, nodular, both, or neither. Type I LM is defined by positive CSF cytology (confirmed LM) whereas type II LM is defined by typical clinical and MRI signs (probable or possible LM). Here we explored the clinical utility of these LM subtypes. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively assembled data from 254 patients with newly diagnosed LM from solid tumors. Survival curves were derived using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Log-rank test.

resultsMedian age at LM diagnosis was 56 years. Typical clinical LM features were noted in 225 patients (89%); 13 patients (5%) were clinically asymptomatic. Tumor cells in the CSF were observed in 186 patients (73%) whereas the CSF was equivocal in 24 patients (9.5%) and negative in 44 patients (17.5%). Patients with confirmed LM had inferior outcome compared with patients with probable or possible LM (P = 0.006). Type I patients had inferior outcome than type II patients (P = 0.002). Nodular disease on MRI was a negative prognostic factor in type II LM (P = 0.014), but not in type I LM. Administration of either intrathecal pharmacotherapy (P = 0.020) or systemic pharmacotherapy (P = 0.0004) was associated with improved outcome in type I LM, but not in type II LM.

conclusionThe EANO ESMO LM subtypes are highly prognostic and should be considered for stratification and overall design of clinical trials.

Indexed as

Meningeal CarcinomatosisMeningeal NeoplasmsNeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisRetrospective Studiescerebrospinalfluidintrathecalmeningitisneoplastic

Identifiers

PMID33367859
PMCPMC8301235
OpenAlexW3116807782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.