Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33367830›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of infectious diseases2021

SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays in Control and Unknown Populations Demonstrate the Necessity of Virus Neutralization Testing.

Jennifer A Rathe, Emily A Hemann, Julie Eggenberger, Zhaoqi Li, Megan L Knoll, Caleb Stokes, Tien-Ying Hsiang, Jason Netland, Kennidy K Takehara, Marion Pepper and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Performance of anterior nares and tongue swabs for nucleic acid, Nucleocapsid, and Spike antigen testing for detecting SARS-CoV-2 against nasopharyngeal PCR and viral culture.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer A RatheDepartment of Immunology, Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Emily A HemannDepartment of Immunology, Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Julie EggenbergerDepartment of Immunology, Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Zhaoqi LiDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Megan L KnollDepartment of Immunology, Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Caleb StokesDepartment of Immunology, Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Tien-Ying HsiangDepartment of Immunology, Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jason NetlandDepartment of Immunology, Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kennidy K TakeharaDepartment of Immunology, Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Marion PepperDepartment of Immunology, Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Michael GaleDepartment of Immunology, Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Washington · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
Leadership Group for the Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Consortium (IDCRCLG) - Momi-Vax DMID #21-0004 {Supplement #6}UM1AI148684 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID S STEPHENS · 2020 to 2026
$77.2M
University of Washington Arboviral Research Network (UWARN)U01AI151698 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Michael Gale, PETER MACGARR RABINOWITZ · 2020 to 2026
$13.3M
Diseases of Public Health Importance Training GrantT32AI007509 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LUND, JENNIFER M · 1997 to 2024
$6.3M
Innate Immune Regulation of Zika Virus InfectionR01AI145296 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI COYNE, CAROLYN B, DIAMOND, MICHAEL S · 2019 to 2023
$4.1M
Mechanisms of Interferon-Lambda Programming at the Innate-Adaptive Immune Interface for Protection Against Virus InfectionK22AI146141 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HEMANN, EMILY ANN · 2021 to 2022
$268k
NIAID NIH HHS K22 AI146141NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI145296NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007509NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI151698NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI148684NIH HHS P51 OD010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine how serologic antibody testing outcome links with virus neutralization of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), we evaluated individuals for SARS-CoV-2 antibody level and viral neutralization.

methodsWe compared serum Ig levels across platforms of viral antigens and antibodies with 15 positive and 30 negative SARS-CoV-2 controls followed by viral neutralization assessment. We then applied these platforms to a clinically relevant cohort of 114 individuals with unknown histories of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

resultsIn controls, the best-performing virus-specific antibody detection platforms were SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG (sensitivity 87%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value [PPV] 100%, negative predictive value [NPV] 94%), spike IgG3 (sensitivity 93%, specificity 97%, PPV 93%, NPV 97%), and nucleocapsid protein (NP) IgG (sensitivity 93%, specificity 97%, PPV 93%, NPV 97%). Neutralization of positive and negative control sera showed 100% agreement. Twenty individuals with unknown history had detectable SARS-CoV-2 antibodies with 16 demonstrating virus neutralization. Spike IgG3 provided the highest accuracy for predicting serologically positive individuals with virus neutralization activity (misidentified 1/20 unknowns compared to 2/20 for RBD and NP IgG).

conclusionsThe coupling of virus neutralization analysis to a spike IgG3 antibody test is optimal to categorize patients for correlates of SARS-CoV-2 immune protection status.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 Serological TestingEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansImmunity, HumoralImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2antibodyimmunityneutralizationSARS-CoV-2serologictwo-tiered testing

Identifiers

PMID33367830
PMCPMC7798987
OpenAlexW3115163512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.