ArticlePlant communications2020
Phylogenomic Insights into Deep Phylogeny of Angiosperms Based on Broad Nuclear Gene Sampling.
Article in Plant communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneous Inference of Flora-Wide Nuclear and Plastid Phylogenies Using Angiosperms353 Sequence Capture Data.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Integrative genomic, transcriptomic, and metabolomic profiling of Dillenia suffruticosa.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Convergent evolution of hexenal isomerases in Lepidoptera and plants.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Dissecting mitogenomic conflict to illuminate angiosperm deep phylogeny: Sequence and architectural evidence.Plant diversity · 2026Article
- Phylogenomic discordance is driven mainly by pervasive ancient hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting during the early divergence of major angiosperm lineages.Plant communications · 2025Article
- Causes of delayed angiosperm diversification: The photosynthetic revolution, increased opportunity costs of anti-herbivore defenses, selection for qualitative toxins, and acceleration of plant-herbivore coevolution.American journal of botany · 2025Review
- Epilobieae genomes and the evolution of Myrtales.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Evolutionary history of magnoliid genomes and benzylisoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis.Nature communications · 2025Article
- SOI: robust identification of orthologous synteny with the Orthology Index and broad applications in evolutionary genomics.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- New insights on angiosperm crown age based on Bayesian node dating and skyline fossilized birth-death approaches.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Phylogenomics of angiosperms based on mitochondrial genes: insights into deep node relationships.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Yerba mate (eLife · 2025Article
- Modeling compositional heterogeneity resolves deep phylogeny of flowering plants.Plant diversity · 2025Article
- Assembly and comparative analysis of the mitochondrial genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Uncovering hundreds of exogenous and endogenous RNA viral RdRp sequences amongst uncharacterized sequences in public protein databases.Virus evolution · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genome of Pueraria provides insights for species identification, phylogenetic relationships, and taxonomy.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- The jacktree genome and population genomics provides insights for the mechanisms of the germination obstacle and the conservation of endangered ornamental plants.Horticulture research · 2024Article
- Intraspecific Differentiation ofGenes · 2024Article
- The chromosome-level genomes of the herbal magnoliids Warburgia ugandensis and Saururus chinensis.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Cretaceous chloranthoids: early prominence, extinct diversity and missing links.Annals of botany · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angiosperms (flowering plants) are the most diverse and species-rich group of plants. The vast majority (∼99.95%) of angiosperms form a clade called Mesangiospermae, which is subdivided into five major groups: eudicots, monocots, magnoliids, Chloranthales, and Ceratophyllales. The relationships among these Mesangiospermae groups have been the subject of long debate. In this study, we assembled a phylogenomic dataset of 1594 genes from 151 angiosperm taxa, including representatives of all five lineages, to investigate the phylogeny of major angiosperm lineages under both coalescent- and concatenation-based methods. We dissected the phylogenetic signal and found that more than half of the genes lack phylogenetic information for the backbone of angiosperm phylogeny. We further removed the genes with weak phylogenetic signal and showed that eudicots, Ceratophyllales, and Chloranthales form a clade, with magnoliids and monocots being the next successive sister lineages. Similar frequencies of gene tree conflict are suggestive of incomplete lineage sorting along the backbone of the angiosperm phylogeny. Our analyses suggest that a fully bifurcating species tree may not be the best way to represent the early radiation of angiosperms. Meanwhile, we inferred that the crown-group angiosperms originated approximately between 255.1 and 222.2 million years ago, and Mesangiospermae diversified into the five extant groups in a short time span (∼27 million years) at the Early to Late Jurassic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.