Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33367204›Full record

ArticleNature electronics2020

Neuromorphic Spintronics.

J Grollier, D Querlioz, K Y Camsari, K Everschor-Sitte, S Fukami, M D Stiles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature electronics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Synaptic κ-GaAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stack-Engineered Mode Selection in PtMn/(Co/Pd)ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Metrics for spin-based computing.Nature reviews. Physics · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Depth Profiling of Oxygen Migration in Ta/HfOACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Li-Well ZnO Memtransistors: High Reliability for Neuromorphic Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J GrollierUnité Mixte de Physique CNRS, Thales, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91767 Palaiseau, France.
D QuerliozCentre de Nanosciences et de Nanotechnologies, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France.
K Y CamsariSchool of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 USA.
K Everschor-SitteInstitute of Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany.
S FukamiResearch Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 9808577, Japan.
M D StilesNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromorphic computing uses basic principles inspired by the brain to design circuits that perform artificial intelligence tasks with superior energy efficiency. Traditional approaches have been limited by the energy area of artificial neurons and synapses realized with conventional electronic devices. In recent years, multiple groups have demonstrated that spintronic nanodevices, which exploit the magnetic as well as electrical properties of electrons, can increase the energy efficiency and decrease the area of these circuits. Among the variety of spintronic devices that have been used, magnetic tunnel junctions play a prominent role because of their established compatibility with standard integrated circuits and their multifunctionality. Magnetic tunnel junctions can serve as synapses, storing connection weights, functioning as local, nonvolatile digital memory or as continuously varying resistances. As nano-oscillators, they can serve as neurons, emulating the oscillatory behavior of sets of biological neurons. As superparamagnets, they can do so by emulating the random spiking of biological neurons. Magnetic textures like domain walls or skyrmions can be configured to function as neurons through their non-linear dynamics. Several implementations of neuromorphic computing with spintronic devices demonstrate their promise in this context. Used as variable resistance synapses, magnetic tunnel junctions perform pattern recognition in an associative memory. As oscillators, they perform spoken digit recognition in reservoir computing and when coupled together, classification of signals. As superparamagnets, they perform population coding and probabilistic computing. Simulations demonstrate that arrays of nanomagnets and films of skyrmions can operate as components of neuromorphic computers. While these examples show the unique promise of spintronics in this field, there are several challenges to scaling up, including the efficiency of coupling between devices and the relatively low ratio of maximum to minimum resistances in the individual devices.

Identifiers

PMID33367204
PMCPMC7754689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.