Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33365323›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2020

Advances in the Approaches Using Peripheral Perfusion for Monitoring Hemodynamic Status.

Julianne M Falotico, Koichiro Shinozaki, Kota Saeki, Lance B Becker

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06253325 (An Observational Pilot Study for the Multi-Modality Risk Prediction and Early Identification of Critically Ill Septic Patients in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06253325 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

An Observational Pilot Study for the Multi-Modality Risk Prediction and Early Identification of Critically Ill Septic Patients in the Emergency Department

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsSepsisArmsMeasuring tissue oxygenation, Procalcitonin, Mid-regional proadrenomedullin, Hand-held video microscope
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julianne M FaloticoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States.
Koichiro ShinozakiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States.
Kota SaekiThe Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States.
Lance B BeckerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measures of peripheral perfusion can be used to assess the hemodynamic status of critically ill patients. By monitoring peripheral perfusion status, clinicians can promptly initiate life-saving therapy and reduce the likelihood of shock-associated death. Historically, abnormal perfusion has been indicated by the observation of pale, cold, and clammy skin with increased capillary refill time. The utility of these assessments has been debated given that clinicians may vary in their clinical interpretation of body temperature and refill time. Considering these constraints, current sepsis bundles suggest the need to revise resuscitation guidelines. New technologies have been developed to calculate capillary refill time in the hopes of identifying a new gold standard for clinical care. These devices measure either light reflected at the surface of the fingertip (reflected light), or light transmitted through the inside of the fingertip (transmitted light). These new technologies may enable clinicians to monitor peripheral perfusion status more accurately and may increase the potential for ubiquitous hemodynamic monitoring across different clinical settings. This review will summarize the different methods available for peripheral perfusion monitoring and will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Indexed as

capillary refill timehemodynamic statusmedical devicemonitoringopticsperipheral perfusionsepsisshock

Identifiers

PMID33365323
PMCPMC7750533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.