Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33365295›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2020

Reduction of Management Costs and Avoidance of Air Release of Carcinogens Through a Waste Segregation Program in a Brazilian Medical Institution.

Fabiane Kellem Oliveira Cesario, Renata Pereira Fontoura, Amarildo Henrique da Conceição Junior, Amanda Gentil Cruz, Nidah Fawzi Said Nimer, Poliana Brito Morais, Brenda Monteiro Omena, Edivaldo Bazilio Dos Santos, Anderson Arantes Silvestrini, Rosângela Vieira Andrade

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fabiane Kellem Oliveira CesarioDF Star, Brasília, Brazil.
Renata Pereira FontouraGenomic Sciences and Biotechnology Department, Catholic University of Brasilia (UCB), Brasília, Brazil.
Amarildo Henrique da Conceição JuniorAcademic League of Oncology of Base Hospital, Brasília, Brazil.
Amanda Gentil CruzDF Star, Brasília, Brazil.
Nidah Fawzi Said NimerDF Star, Brasília, Brazil.
Poliana Brito MoraisDF Star, Brasília, Brazil.
Brenda Monteiro OmenaDF Star, Brasília, Brazil.
Edivaldo Bazilio Dos SantosDF Star, Brasília, Brazil.
Anderson Arantes SilvestriniDF Star, Brasília, Brazil.
Rosângela Vieira AndradeGenomic Sciences and Biotechnology Department, Catholic University of Brasilia (UCB), Brasília, Brazil.
Universidade de Brasília · BRHospital de Base · BRUniversidade Católica de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospital waste management is a current sustainability challenge. Although not always performed, the most applied approach in current protocols is the proper segregation of waste. The incineration of hospital waste is an significant source of emission of specific toxic particles and gases. We highlighted dioxins, whose representatives have been considered carcinogenic agents since 1994. Several experimental and epidemiologic studies have shown greater cancer morbidity and mortality associated with dioxin exposure. In the present study, we presented the impact of a hospital waste management program implemented in an oncology institution based on proper segregation and consequent reduction of incinerated mass. Data were collected for 8 years and the waste was separated into five categories: infectious (A4), chemical (B), recyclable (DR), non-recyclable (DNR), and sharps (E). The classes addressed to incineration were A4, B, and E. A team education starting from the admission process and with a continued education program was essential for a successfully implemented program. We achieved a 66% saving of waste from incineration, equivalent to 76 tons, of which 71.9 tons corresponded to recyclable waste. If the waste separation protocol was not implemented, the biohazardous and chemical material would contaminate the rest of the residues, making incineration as a final destination mandatory for all the waste. This scenario would result in significantly more dioxins release and a 64% higher cost of waste management. This low-cost implementation measure was effective in the cost reduction of waste management and minimization of air release of human carcinogens.

Indexed as

DioxinsWaste ManagementBrazilCarcinogensHumansIncinerationCarcinogensDioxinscarcinogenic agentsdioxinsgaseshospital waste disposalincineration (INC)oncologytoxic particleswaste management

Identifiers

PMID33365295
PMCPMC7750356
OpenAlexW3110983922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.