Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33365275›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2020

Revealing the Disturbed Vaginal Micobiota Caused by Cervical Cancer Using High-Throughput Sequencing Technology.

Yupei Xie, Ying Feng, Wenyu Li, Fuliang Zhan, Genhua Huang, Hui Hu, Yifei Xiong, Buzhen Tan, Tingtao Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Interplay Between Cervicovaginal Microbiota Diversity,Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Updates on Group BMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yupei XieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Ying FengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Wenyu LiNational Engineering Research Center for Bioengineering Drugs and the Technologies, Institute of Translational Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Fuliang ZhanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Genhua HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Hui HuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yifei XiongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Buzhen TanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Tingtao ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Nanchang University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent cancer type among all malignancies, so it is of great significance to find its actual pathogenesis mechanisms. In the present study, 90 women were enrolled, and high-throughput sequencing technology was firstly used to analyze the vaginal microbiota of healthy women (C group), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia patients (CIN group) and cervical cancer patients (CER group). Our results indicates that compared with C group, a higher HPV infection rate as well as increased Neutrophil ratio and tumor marker squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) were obtained, and a decrease in Lymphocyte ratio and Hemoglobin were also present. In addition, the cervical cancer showed a strong association with reduced probiotics

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPapillomaviridaeTechnologycervical cancercervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasiaLactobacillusvaginal microbial disordersvaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID33365275
PMCPMC7750457
OpenAlexW3113350370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.