Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33365227›Full record

ArticleCurrent epidemiology reports2020

Feasible but Not Yet Efficacious: A Scoping Review of Wearable Activity Monitors in Interventions Targeting Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Sleep.

Maan Isabella Cajita, Christopher E Kline, Lora E Burke, Evelyn G Bigini, Christopher C Imes

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Current epidemiology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. mHealth Technology and CVD Risk Reduction.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maan Isabella CajitaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, College of Nursing, 845 S. Damen Ave., Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2331-1229
Christopher E KlineUniversity of Pittsburgh, Department of Health and Physical Activity, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1025-9430
Lora E BurkeUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2434-9867
Evelyn G BiginiUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Christopher C ImesUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0666-3142
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Institutional Career DevelopmentKL2TR002002 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI PHILLIPS, SHANE A · 2016 to 2024
$6.8M
Reducing sedentary behavior to improve sleep: an ancillary study to the RESET BP clinical trialR01HL147610 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
A Novel Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease: The Insomnia-Short Sleep PhenotypK23HL118318 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD · 2014 to 2018
$776k
Disentangling subclinical cardiovascular risk associated with insomnia, short sleep duration, and their combinationR03HL148357 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD · 2019 to 2020
$156k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002002NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL118318NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL147610NHLBI NIH HHS R03 HL148357NINR NIH HHS L30 NR019388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe present review aimed to explore the range and characteristics of interventions that utilize WAM and descriptively summarize the efficacy of these interventions. RECENT

findingsA total of 65 articles (61 studies) were included in this review. Most of the WAM-based interventions (n=58) were designed to improve physical activity (PA). Interventions targeting sedentary behavior (SB) were much less common (n=12), and even less frequent were WAM-based sleep interventions (n=3). Most studies tested the feasibility of WAM-based interventions; hence, efficacy of these interventions in improving PA, SB, and/or sleep could not be conclusively determined. Nonetheless, WAM-based interventions showed considerable potential in increasing PA and decreasing SB. SUMMARY: WAM-based PA interventions exhibited preliminary efficacy in increasing PA. Although not as many interventions were focused on SB, current interventions also showed potential in decreasing sedentary time. Meanwhile, more evidence is needed to determine the utility of WAM in improving sleep. Major challenges with including WAM as part of interventions are reduced engagement in using the devices over time and the rapid changes in technology resulting in devices becoming obsolete soon after completion of an efficacy trial.

Indexed as

fitness trackersphysical activitysedentary behaviorsleepwearable activity monitors

Identifiers

PMID33365227
PMCPMC7751894
OpenAlexW3004278660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.