ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020
Analgesic Effect Comparison Between Nalbuphine and Sufentanil for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05073744 (Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Nalbuphine Versus Morphine for Perioperative Tumor Ablation), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Nalbuphine Versus Morphine for Perioperative Tumor Ablation: a Randomized, Control, Multicentre Trial
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison between butorphanol and nalbuphine for alleviation of catheter-related bladder discomfort and emergence agitation in patients undergoing open spinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial.Annals of medicine · 2025Trial
- Effect of Dexmedetomidine on the EDDrug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Hydromorphone and Nalbuphine for Postcesarean Patient-Controlled Analgesia and Developing a Risk Prediction Model for Inadequate Analgesia.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Comparison of IV Nalbuphine versus ibuprofen for Postoperative Pain control in cesarean section.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Effects of different opioids on the contractile tension of isolated rat intestinal smooth muscle.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Pharmacologic Analgesia for Cesarean Section: An Update in 2024.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Epidural Chloroprocaine for Breakthrough Pain During Labor Analgesia: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial.Pain and therapy · 2024Article
- Patient-controlled intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine with nalbuphine versus sufentanil for post cesarean delivery analgesia: A retrospective observational study.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2023Observational
- Nalbuphine May Be Superior to Sufentanil in Relieving Postcesarean Uterine Contraction Pain in Multiparas: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2023Article
- Exploring the Effect of Pain Sensitive Questionnaire on Guiding Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Randomised Double Blind Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Analgesic Effect of Esketamine Combined with Tramadol for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Analgesia Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Combined with Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Double-Blind Controlled Trial.Pain and therapy · 2022Article
- Article
- Comparison of Analgesic Effects between Nalbuphine and Sufentanil in First-Trimester Surgical Abortion: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.Pain and therapy · 2022Article
- The median effective doses of propofol combined with two different doses of nalbuphine for adult patients during painless gastroscopy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Influence of Catheter-Incision Congruency in Epidural Analgesia on Postcesarean Pain Management: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.