ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020
Quantitative Multi-Parameter Mapping Optimized for the Clinical Routine.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neuromelanin-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Investigating effects of day-to-day variations in environmental exposure on the human brain: study protocol for the Day2Day Environment project.BMC neuroscience · 2026Article
- Longitudinal changes of choroid plexus volumes and MRI ratios in multiple sclerosis.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Microstructure-informed deep learning improves thalamic atrophy segmentation and clinical associations in multiple sclerosis and related neuroimmunological diseases.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Relevance of choroid plexus volumes in multiple sclerosis.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025Article
- Translational network neuroscience: Nine roadblocks and possible solutions.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Toward a standard preoperative MRI protocol for functional neurosurgery.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- A quantitative multi-parameter mapping protocol standardized for clinical research in multiple sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Joint MAPLE: Accelerated joint T1 and T2∗ mapping with scan-specific self-supervised networksMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- An exploratory research report on brain mineralization in postoperative delirium and cognitive decline.The European journal of neuroscience · 2024Article
- The T1-weighted/T2-weighted ratio as a biomarker of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2024Article
- Protocol of a prospective multicenter study on comorbidity impact on multiple sclerosis and antibody-mediated diseases of the central nervous system (COMMIT).Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Berlin Registry of Neuroimmunological entities (BERLimmun): protocol of a prospective observational study.BMC neurology · 2022Observational
- The German National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON): rationale, study design and baseline characteristics.European journal of epidemiology · 2022Review
- Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Brain communications · 2022Review
- Clinical and neuroimaging findings in MOGAD-MRI and OCT.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using quantitative multi-parameter mapping (MPM), studies can investigate clinically relevant microstructural changes with high reliability over time and across subjects and sites. However, long acquisition times (20 min for the standard 1-mm isotropic protocol) limit its translational potential. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity gain of a fast 1.6-mm isotropic MPM protocol including post-processing optimized for longitudinal clinical studies. 6 healthy volunteers (35±7 years old; 3 female) were scanned at 3T to acquire the following whole-brain MPM maps with 1.6 mm isotropic resolution: proton density (PD), magnetization transfer saturation (MT), longitudinal relaxation rate (R1), and transverse relaxation rate (R2
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.