Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33364890›Full record

ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2020

Is Cyclic Exercise Performed before Tibial Fixation Effective on Grafts during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Burak Gunaydin, Yasar Mahsut Dincel, Abdulkadir Sari, Mehmet Umit Cetin, Cem Sever, Cagatay Tekin, Melih Guney, Yavuz Selim Kabukcuoglu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Burak GunaydinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdag, Turkey.
Yasar Mahsut DincelDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdag, Turkey.
Abdulkadir SariDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdag, Turkey.
Mehmet Umit CetinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdag, Turkey.
Cem SeverDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Sisli Kolan International Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cagatay TekinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Cizre State Hospital, Sirnak, Turkey.
Melih GuneyDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdag, Turkey.
Yavuz Selim KabukcuogluDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdag, Turkey.
Memorial Sisli Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe necessity of cyclic exercise to pre-stretch the autograft before tibial fixation during ACL reconstruction is unknown. In this study, we evaluated whether there was a statistically significant difference between the results of patients who underwent cyclic exercise by way of physical examinations, knee joint stability tests, and functional evaluation tests, compared with the patients who underwent ACL reconstructions with or without cyclic exercise.

methodsBetween March 2016 and May 2018, 59 patients with at least eight months' follow-up of an ACL reconstruction were identified. Thirty patients (Group 1) who underwent cyclic exercise before tibial fixation and 29 patients (Group 2) who did not undergo cyclic exercise were evaluated and compared.

resultsThe mean age of the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 was 25.9 (range, 18-36) years and 25.2 (range, 18-35) years, respectively. The mean follow-up period in Group 1 was 14.6 (range, 8-22) months and 13.5 months in Group 2 (range, 8-21 months).The mean Lysholm scores of Group 1 and 2 were 95.1 (range, 83-100) and 87.1 (range, 78-100), respectively. The modified Cincinnati scores of Groups 1 and 2 were 28.7 (range, 24-30) and 26.2 (range, 21-30). The mean IKDC subjective knee evaluation scores in Groups 1 and 2 were 91.9 (range, 83-100) and 86.7 (range, 75-100). The mean thigh atrophy was 1.5 cm in Group 1 and 2.5 cm in Group 2. In Group 1, 23 patients jumped 85% of the distance compared with the intact side in the single-legged hop test, and 12 patients in Group 2 were able to hop this distance successfully.Group 1 had statistically significantly better results in Lysholm activity scores, modified Cincinnati scores, IKDC subjective knee assessment scores, two-time IKDC activity scale results, comparison of thigh diameters, and single-legged hop tests (p<0.05). No significant difference was found in other examinations and tests.

conclusionCyclic exercise during the operation had a positive effect on functional scores. We believe that cyclic exercise should be added to the operative procedure.

Indexed as

Anterior cruciate ligamentarthroscopic reconstructioncyclic exercisefunctional knee scoring

Identifiers

PMID33364890
PMCPMC7751239
OpenAlexW3008561208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.