ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2020
Tinnitus and cognition: Can load theory help us refine our understanding?
Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic architecture distinguishes tinnitus from hearing loss.Nature communications · 2024Pooled it
- Observational
- Association between tinnitus and cognitive impairment: analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011:2014.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Cognitive Screening and Hearing Assessment in Patients With Chronic Tinnitus.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2024Article
- Review and Perspective on Brain Bases of Tinnitus.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023Review
- Tinnitus and Influencing Comorbidities.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2023Review
- Vascular Factors in Patients with Midlife Sensorineural Hearing Loss and the Progression to Mild Cognitive Impairment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Cognitive functioning and psychosomatic syndromes in a subjective tinnitus sample.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The corticofugal oscillatory modulation of the cochlear receptor during auditory and visual attention is preserved in tinnitus.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2023Article
- Functional changes in the auditory cortex and associated regions caused by different acoustic stimuli in patients with presbycusis and tinnitus.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Neuroticism as a covariate of cognitive task performance in individuals with tinnitus.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- A large-scale diffusion imaging study of tinnitus and hearing loss.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Too Blind to See the Elephant? Why Neuroscientists Ought to Be Interested in Tinnitus.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Review
- The evaluation of global cognitive and emotional status of older patients with chronic tinnitus.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
- Tinnitus and cognition: Can load theory help us refine our understanding?Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2020Review
- Pre-treatment structural brain biomarkers predict response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in subjective tinnitus.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Association of Tinnitus With Speech Recognition and Executive Functions in Older Adults.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.