Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33364247›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2020

Molecular Mechanisms Lead to Sex-Specific COVID-19 Prognosis and Targeted Therapies.

Thushara Galbadage, Brent M Peterson, Jeffrey S Wang, Avishka Jayasekara, Danny A Ramirez, Joseph Awada, John P Walsh, Richard S Gunasekera

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thushara GalbadageDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Science, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, United States.
Brent M PetersonDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Science, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, United States.
Jeffrey S WangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Avishka JayasekaraLeonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Danny A RamirezDepartment of Chemistry, Physics, and Engineering, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, United States.
Joseph AwadaDepartment of Chemistry, Physics, and Engineering, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, United States.
John P WalshLeonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Richard S GunasekeraDepartment of Chemistry, Physics, and Engineering, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, United States.
Biola University · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical and epidemiological studies have identified male sex as an important risk factor for COVID-19 clinical outcomes and mortality. This raises the question as to how this risk factor can be addressed in the prognosis, clinical management, and the treatment of patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Currently, there are no guidelines or protocols to help alter the course of sex-specific COVID-19 prognosis, especially in severe disease presentations. This is partly due to the lack of research studies characterizing the differences in male vs. female host response to the severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and a lack of a well-rounded understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved. Here, we discuss three distinct but interconnected molecular-level differences in males and females that likely play an essential role in the COVID-19 prognosis. We review interactions of SARS-CoV-2 with host cell angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in the viral entry between males vs. females and discuss the differential regulation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) between the two sexes. Next, we present immune response disparities and how immune function and endocrine regulation may render males increasingly vulnerable to severe COVID-19. We describe the interconnected roles of these three regulatory systems in males and females in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Finally, we highlight the clinical implications of these mechanisms to patients with COVID-19 and propose putative targeted therapies that can help reduce COVID-19 severity in those critically ill.

Indexed as

ACE2androgencoronavirusendocrineimmunitymaleSARS-CoV-2sex

Identifiers

PMID33364247
PMCPMC7753152
OpenAlexW3046840767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.