Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33364242›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2020

Effect of a Multimodal Movement Intervention in Patients With Neurogenic Claudication Based on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and/or Degenerative Spondylolisthesis-A Pilot Study.

Kim-Charline Broscheid, Tom Behrendt, Dennis Hamacher, Svantje Böker, Tabea Gagelmann, Christian Schmidt, Christina Caspari, Katharina Meiler, Andre Napiontek, Jörg Franke and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Dance for Chronic Pain Conditions: A Systematic Review.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Association between lumbar spine kinematics and falls in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a cross-sectional study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kim-Charline BroscheidDepartment Human Science, Sport Science, Institute III, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Tom BehrendtDepartment Human Science, Sport Science, Institute III, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Dennis HamacherDepartment Human Science, Sport Science, Institute III, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Svantje BökerDepartment Human Science, Sport Science, Institute III, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Tabea GagelmannDepartment Human Science, Sport Science, Institute III, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christian SchmidtDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Klinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christina CaspariDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Klinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Katharina MeilerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Klinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Andre NapiontekAssociation for Health, Exercise and Sport, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jörg FrankeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Klinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Lutz SchegaDepartment Human Science, Sport Science, Institute III, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEKlinikum Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic low-back pain is a major individual, social, and economic burden. The impairment ranges from deterioration of gait, limited mobility, to psychosocial distress. Due to this complexity, the demand for multimodal treatments is huge. Our purpose is to compare the effects of a multimodal movement intervention (MI) (coordinative-cognitive exercises and dancing program) with standard physical therapy (PT) on gait, physical function, and quality of life in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The study design is based on a 6-week intervention with a two (group: MI/PT) by two (measurement time points: pre-/post-test) parallel group design with random assignment. Twenty-four subjects (18 female/6 male, 70.8 ± 10.6 years old) diagnosed with LSS were included and randomly allocated to the MI or PT group. The primary outcomes are minimum toe clearance (MTC) and double step length (DSL) variability and the Timed "Up & Go" test (TUG). Secondary outcomes are the Brief Pain Inventory, the short Fall Efficacy Scale-International (sFES-I), and the Oswestry Disability Index. Nine subjects for each group could be analyzed. The MTC variability revealed a significant between-group difference in the posttest (

Indexed as

chronic low-back paindegenerative spondylolisthesisfunctional mobilitygait variabilitylumbar spinal stenosisrisk of fallingspinal cord claudicationthe timed “up & go” test

Identifiers

PMID33364242
PMCPMC7753178
OpenAlexW3110963493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.