ArticleCureus2020
Antiplatelet Therapy for Stent-Assisted Coil of Ruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Bifurcation Aneurysm: Is There a Right Answer?
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of clinical and angiographic outcomes after woven EndoBridge treatment for intracranial aneurysms: an asian multicenter cohort study.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Variability patterns in dual antiplatelet therapy following endovascular repair of intracranial aneurysms: Insight into regimen heterogeneity and the need for a consensus.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Review
- Trends in Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Use for Neurointerventional Procedures for the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms.Biomedicines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A variety of modalities exist for treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Stent-assisted coiling is an effective option but poses a challenge regarding antiplatelet therapy. No consensus exists among neuroendovascular surgeons regarding preferred agent, dose, and timing to balance the risk of thromboembolism and hemorrhage. This is especially true in the setting of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. We present a 66-year-old female with history of thrombocytopenia and nonalcoholic cirrhosis who presented with severe headache. Head CT demonstrated a right temporal lobe intraparenchymal hemorrhage with sylvian fissure subarachnoid hemorrhage. Cerebral angiogram showed a 1.5mm x 1.5mm right middle cerebral artery (MCA) bifurcation aneurysm. The patient underwent Y-stent coiling from the right M1 into the right M2 superior division and the right M1 into the right M2 inferior division, with a 1mm x 1cm coil. Given the patient's thrombocytopenia, only aspirin monotherapy was administered peri-procedural. Shortly thereafter, the patient developed left hemiparesis. Computed tomography angiogram (CTA) demonstrated thrombus within the stent. Thrombectomy was performed with thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 3 revascularization and improvement to neurologic baseline. However, that evening she became acutely hypotensive, unresponsive, and ultimately expired due to hemorrhagic cause. Antiaggregate therapy among neuroendovascular procedures is debated with no clear standard of care. This case highlights the difficult decisions that must be made to balance the risks associated with the use of antiplatelets with ruptured aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.