ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020
Optimal Display Positions for Heads-Up Surgery to Minimize Crosstalk.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of neck angle and musculoskeletal discomfort of surgeon in cataract surgery between three-dimensional heads-up display system and conventional microscope.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Optimization of surgeon ergonomics with three-dimensional heads-up display for ophthalmic surgeries.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine optimal display positions during heads-up surgery (HUS) to minimize crosstalk. Methods: Three three-dimensional (3D) displays were analyzed to evaluate the relationship between display position and amount of crosstalk. First, the 3D displays were calibrated to show a completely white image in the right eye and completely black image in the left eye. Images were captured through the polarized filter, which corresponded to the left-eye image. The amount of crosstalk in the left eye was measured as white areas on the black background that originated from the right-eye image. The amount of crosstalk was measured at different display distances and heights to estimate the non-crosstalk display positions for each display. Results: Varying amounts of crosstalk (0%-70.3%) were observed for different display distances and heights. The crosstalk almost always started from the corner of the display, although the starting area varied according to the type of display. The minimum distance of non-crosstalk position was 1.26 meters away from display 1, 1.24 meters away from display 2, and 1.8 meters away from display 3. With regard to display height, the optimal center-of-display heights for displays 1, 2, and 3 were 72 mm below, 18 mm above, and 101 mm above eye level, respectively. Conclusions: The amount of crosstalk differed according to display positions and displays. Translational Relevance: The optimal HUS display settings differ among displays; therefore, each surgeon should carefully evaluate individual display characteristics before using HUS in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.