Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33363703›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020

Experimental and computational approaches to unravel microbial community assembly.

Daniel Aguirre de Cárcer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Atomic-scale insights into allosteric inhibition and evolutional rescue mechanism ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel Aguirre de CárcerDepartamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial communities have a preponderant role in the life support processes of our common home planet Earth. These extremely diverse communities drive global biogeochemical cycles, and develop intimate relationships with most multicellular organisms, with a significant impact on their fitness. Our understanding of their composition and function has enjoyed a significant thrust during the last decade thanks to the rise of high-throughput sequencing technologies. Intriguingly, the diversity patterns observed in nature point to the possible existence of fundamental community assembly rules. Unfortunately, these rules are still poorly understood, despite the fact that their knowledge could spur a scientific, technological, and economic revolution, impacting, for instance, agricultural, environmental, and health-related practices. In this minireview, I recapitulate the most important wet lab techniques and computational approaches currently employed in the study of microbial community assembly, and briefly discuss various experimental designs. Most of these approaches and considerations are also relevant to the study of microbial microevolution, as it has been shown that it can occur in ecological relevant timescales. Moreover, I provide a succinct review of various recent studies, chosen based on the diversity of ecological concepts addressed, experimental designs, and choice of wet lab and computational techniques. This piece aims to serve as a primer to those new to the field, as well as a source of new ideas to the more experienced researchers.

Indexed as

Community assemblyComputational biologyMicrobial communitiesMicrobiomeOmics

Identifiers

PMID33363703
PMCPMC7736701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.