ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2021
Dynamics of APRI and FIB-4 in HCV cirrhotic patients who achieved SVR after DAA therapy.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liver stiffness by non-invasive tests predicts hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related complications following viral eradication with direct-acting antivirals in chronic hepatitis C: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Evolution of Liver Fibrosis in Romanian HCV Patients Following Treatment with Direct-Acting Antivirals.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A review of historical landmarks and pioneering technologies for the diagnosis of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV).European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025Review
- Sustained virological response in HCV patients receiving antiviral treatment at a teaching centre of northern India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- The 90-Day Survival Threshold: A Pivotal Determinant of Long-Term Prognosis in HBV-ACLF Patients - Insights from a Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Severe liver fibrosis in the HCV cure era: Major effects of social vulnerability, diabetes, and unhealthy behaviors.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2022Article
- Real-World Experience of Chronic Hepatitis C-Related Compensated Liver Cirrhosis Treated with Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Evaluation of liver fibrosis using hepatic extracellular volume fraction by contrast-enhanced computed tomography before and after direct-acting antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection: comparison with serological liver fibrosis markers.The British journal of radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are limited data available on the regression of fibrosis in hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients who have achieved sustained virologic response (SVR) after interferon-free treatments. Moreover, a perfect method for assessing liver fibrosis and its dynamics has not been established yet. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the dynamics of aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) scores in patients with HCV who registered SVR. We performed ROC curve analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of APRI and FIB-4 scores in determining the presence of cirrhosis in comparison to FibroTest. In total 251 patients were enrolled: 164 cirrhotic and 83 non-cirrhotic patients, and they were evaluated at baseline, at 6 and at 12 months post-end of treatment (EOT). In the cirrhotic group, at baseline, there was a weak but statistically significant correlation between APRI and FibroTest (τ=0.173, P=0.001), as well as between FIB-4 and FibroTest (τ=0.265, P<0.001). At the 6-month follow-up, APRI no longer correlated with FibroTest (τ=0.144, P=0.057), while FIB-4 was correlated (τ=0.256, P=0.001). The same pattern was shown at 12 months post-EOT. Between baseline and the 6-month evaluation, there was a significant decrease in APRI (P<0.001) and FIB-4 (P<0.001) scores, but for the next follow-up period, there was no reduction. In the non-cirrhotic group, APRI and FIB-4 did not correlate with the FibroTest value at any of the evaluation times. There was a significant difference between baseline and the 6-month visit for APRI (P=0.01) and for FIB-4 (P=0.014). The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROCs) for the presence of cirrhosis compared with FibroTest for APRI and FIB-4 were 0.682 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.613-0.752] and 0.693 (95% CI 0.625-0.76). Both APRI and FIB-4 prove to be easy, quick and inexpensive tools for screening HCV cirrhosis, with moderate diagnostic accuracy and FIB-4 can be useful for monitoring patients post-EOT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.