Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33363541›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2020

CD86 Is a Selective CD28 Ligand Supporting FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cell Homeostasis in the Presence of High Levels of CTLA-4.

Neil Halliday, Cayman Williams, Alan Kennedy, Erin Waters, Anne M Pesenacker, Blagoje Soskic, Claudia Hinze, Tie Zheng Hou, Behzad Rowshanravan, Daniel Janman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Dynamic Synthesis of Multi-Modal Representations for CITE-seq Data Integration and Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neil HallidayInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Cayman WilliamsInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alan KennedyInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Erin WatersInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anne M PesenackerInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Blagoje SoskicInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Claudia HinzeInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tie Zheng HouInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Behzad RowshanravanInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel JanmanInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lucy S K WalkerInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
David M SansomInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 21147Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009203/1Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/N001435/1Versus Arthritis 21738Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 110297/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 20478/Z/16Wellcome Trust 204798/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD80 and CD86 are expressed on antigen presenting cells and are required to engage their shared receptor, CD28, for the costimulation of CD4 T cells. It is unclear why two stimulatory ligands with overlapping roles have evolved. CD80 and CD86 also bind the regulatory molecule CTLA-4. We explored the role of CD80 and CD86 in the homeostasis and proliferation of CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg), which constitutively express high levels of CTLA-4 yet are critically dependent upon CD28 signals. We observed that CD86 was the dominant ligand for Treg proliferation, survival, and maintenance of a regulatory phenotype, with higher expression of CTLA-4, ICOS, and OX40. We also explored whether CD80-CD28 interactions were specifically compromised by CTLA-4 and found that antibody blockade, clinical deficiency of CTLA-4 and CRISPR-Cas9 deletion of CTLA-4 all improved Treg survival following CD80 stimulation. Taken together, our data suggest that CD86 is the dominant costimulatory ligand for Treg homeostasis, despite its lower affinity for CD28, because CD80-CD28 interactions are selectively impaired by the high levels of CTLA-4. These data suggest a cell intrinsic role for CTLA-4 in regulating CD28 costimulation by direct competition for CD80, and indicate that that CD80 and CD86 have discrete roles in CD28 costimulation of CD4 T cells in the presence of high levels of CTLA-4.

Indexed as

B7-2 AntigenCD28 AntigensCTLA-4 AntigenHomeostasisHumansT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryB7-2 AntigenCD28 AntigensCD86 protein, humanCTLA-4 AntigenCTLA4 protein, humanCD28CD80CD86costimulationCTLA-4homeostasisregulatory T cells

Identifiers

PMID33363541
PMCPMC7753196
OpenAlexW3112764055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.