Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33363413›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2020

Development and Assessment of a Prenatal Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Educational Survey: Implementation and Impact in a Metropolitan University-Based Clinic.

Malinda R Schaefer, Jessica Holttum, Megan Olson, Danielle Westenberg, Nathan Rubin, Mark R Schleiss, Jessica Nyholm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Frequency of CMV testing during pregnancy-a retrospective study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malinda R SchaeferDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Jessica HolttumDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8928-2811
Megan OlsonDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Danielle WestenbergDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Nathan RubinBiostatistics Core, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7162-5225
Mark R SchleissDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2108-9433
Jessica NyholmDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
University of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Coordinating Center for Research to Promote the Health of Children with Birth Defects and People with Developmental and Other DisabilitiesU19DD001218 · DD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI CAI, BO, CARLIN, ROBERTA · 2017 to 2021
$7.4M
NCBDD CDC HHS U19 DD001218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCongenital CMV infection can result in serious sequelae in the newborn. The goal of this study was to assess pregnant women's knowledge and understanding of CMV infection during pregnancy and develop an educational tool about CMV infection to be utilized during prenatal care. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a prospective intervention study that assessed pregnant women's knowledge before and after receiving an educational handout about CMV infection in pregnancy and the perceived value of this education. Pre- and post-education questionnaires were utilized to assess knowledge. The pre-education questionnaire and CMV educational handout were given at the same clinic visit. The educational handout was given after the pre-education questionnaire had been completed. The post-education questionnaire was given at the next scheduled prenatal clinic appointment and included questions regarding the level of satisfaction with the education and the perceived value of the information. Pregnant women less than 34 weeks of gestation were eligible.

resultsA total of 263 women were enrolled, 263 completed the pre-CMV educational questionnaire and 215 women completed both questionnaires. Some women only partially completed the questionnaires and those partial responses have been included. Prior to education, 33% (85/261) of participants had heard of CMV. This increased to 75% (160/214) after education. Participants scored each of the recommended hygiene practices between 1 and 5 (5 is the most acceptable) and each recommended hygiene practice received an average score between 3.8 and 5. 74% (134/180) of participants reported increasing their hygienic practices after education. 96% (180/188) of participants indicated they were satisifed to have received the education. 98% (187/190) thought more women should receive this education during prenatal care.

conclusionPregnant women viewed education about CMV favorably and increased the frequency of recommended hygiene practices. Introducing an educational handout to routine prenatal care may be beneficial in increasing awareness of CMV infection in pregnancy.

Indexed as

CMV educationCMV pregnancyCMV vaccinecongenital CMV

Identifiers

PMID33363413
PMCPMC7752651
OpenAlexW3111733256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.