Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33363324›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2020

Evaluation of a modified method of extraction, purification, and characterization of lipopolysaccharide (O antigen) from

Heba M Hassan, Mai A Fadel, Mohamed A Soliman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heba M HassanReference Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on Poultry Production, Animal Health Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center ARC, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Mai A FadelPharmacology and Pyrogen Unit, Department of Chemistry, Toxicology and Food Deficiency, Animal Health Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Mohamed A SolimanReference Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on Poultry Production, Animal Health Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center ARC, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Animal Health Research Institute · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimLipopolysaccharide (LPS) is an integral part of the outer cell membrane complex of Gram-negative bacteria. It plays an important role in the induction and stimulation of the immune system. Various LPS purification protocols have been developed. However, analysis of their efficacy is limited by contamination during downstream applications or the public health hazard of LPS. The aim of this study was to evaluate a modified method for extracting LPS as well as assess the purity of the extracted LPS by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Further, we evaluated its immunopotentiating function by measuring the relative RNA expression levels of splenic immune-related genes such as interleukin 1β (IL-1β) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ), after intramuscular injection of increasing concentrations of the extracted LPS in specific pathogen-free (SPF) chick. MATERIALS AND

methodsIsolation, identification, and serotyping of

resultsIsolation and serotyping revealed that

conclusionThe new modified method can be used for high purity LPS extraction and demonstrates effective immunopotentiating activity.

Indexed as

extractionhigh-performance liquid chromatographyinterferon-γ and interleukin 1β genes expressionLPS (O antigen)purificationquantitative polymerase chain reactionSalmonella Typhimurium

Identifiers

PMID33363324
PMCPMC7750214
OpenAlexW3096492118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.