Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33363207›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2020

Spike Proteins of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 Utilize Different Mechanisms to Bind With Human ACE2.

Yixin Xie, Chitra B Karki, Dan Du, Haotian Li, Jun Wang, Adebiyi Sobitan, Shaolei Teng, Qiyi Tang, Lin Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. AI-Guided Binding Mechanisms and Molecular Dynamics for MERS-CoV.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. SARS-CoV-2 Is an Electricity-Driven Virus.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yixin XieComputational Science Program, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, United States.
Chitra B KarkiComputational Science Program, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, United States.
Dan DuComputational Science Program, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, United States.
Haotian LiDepartment of Physics, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, United States.
Jun WangDepartment of Physics, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, United States.
Adebiyi SobitanDepartment of Biology, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States.
Shaolei TengDepartment of Biology, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States.
Qiyi TangDepartment of Biology, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States.
Lin LiComputational Science Program, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, United States.
The University of Texas at El Paso · USHoward University · US

Funding

Sleep Disorders in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease: Frequency, Associations with Cardiovascular and Pain Indicators, and Responses to TreatmentU54MD007597 · NIMHD · HOWARD UNIVERSITY · PI Tatiana V.D. Sanses · 2019 to 2026
$37.7M
UTEP Border Biomedical Research CenterU54MD007592 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI Gabriel Andrew Frietze · 2019 to 2026
$35.1M
Developing and applying large-scale simulation approach to understand the mechanisms of kinesins' motilities along microtubulesSC1GM132043 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI LI, LIN · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS SC1 GM132043NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007592NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing outbreak of COVID-19 has been a serious threat to human health worldwide. The virus SARS-CoV-2 initiates its infection to the human body via the interaction of its spike (S) protein with the human Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) of the host cells. Therefore, understanding the fundamental mechanisms of how SARS-CoV-2 S protein receptor binding domain (RBD) binds to ACE2 is highly demanded for developing treatments for COVID-19. Here we implemented multi-scale computational approaches to study the binding mechanisms of human ACE2 and S proteins of both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. Electrostatic features, including electrostatic potential, electric field lines, and electrostatic forces of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 were calculated and compared in detail. The results demonstrate that SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 S proteins are both attractive to ACE2 by electrostatic forces even at different distances. However, the residues contributing to the electrostatic features are quite different due to the mutations between SARS-CoV S protein and SARS-CoV-2 S protein. Such differences are analyzed comprehensively. Compared to SARS-CoV, the SARS-CoV-2 binds with ACE2 using a more robust strategy: The electric field line related residues are distributed quite differently, which results in a more robust binding strategy of SARS-CoV-2. Also, SARS-CoV-2 has a higher electric field line density than that of SARS-CoV, which indicates stronger interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and ACE2, compared to that of SARS-CoV. Key residues involved in salt bridges and hydrogen bonds are identified in this study, which may help the future drug design against COVID-19.

Indexed as

ACE2angiotensin-converting enzyme 2COVID-19molecular dynamicprotein- protein interactionsSARSSARS-CoV-2spike protein

Identifiers

PMID33363207
PMCPMC7755986
OpenAlexW3113189927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.